Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32311216›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2020

Impact of participatory training of smallholder pig farmers on knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding biosecurity for the control of African swine fever in Uganda.

Michel Mainack Dione, Ian Dohoo, Nicholas Ndiwa, Jane Poole, Emily Ouma, Winfred Christine Amia, Barbara Wieland

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michel Mainack DioneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7812-5776
Ian DohooUniversity of Prince Edward Islands, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Nicholas NdiwaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jane PooleInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-794X
Emily OumaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-1376
Winfred Christine AmiaInternational Livestock Research Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Barbara WielandInternational Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-9186
International Livestock Research Institute · KEInternational Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering · BFUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

CGIAR Research Program on LivestockIrish Aid
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of a participatory training of pig farmers on knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) of biosecurity relating to ASF control in two districts of Uganda using a randomized control trial (RCT). A total of 830 pig farmers from 32 villages were included in the study, with 425 farmers receiving training, while 405 did not. An item response theory model was used to assess the impact of the training on farmer's KAP. Logistic regression models were used to assess the factors that affected knowledge gain and change in attitude and practices after training. Focus group discussions (FGD) were carried out with selected farmers from the treatment group at the end of the intervention, to share their experiences and discuss potential factors that could hinder adoption of biosecurity in their communities. Results of the regression analyses showed that there was a significant effect of biosecurity training (p = .038) on gain in knowledge after 12 months, but there were limited changes in farmer's attitude and practice at 12 and 28 months after training. Pig production domain (peri-urban/urban production), group membership, gender (male) and education of the farmer positively influenced knowledge gain and attitude of farmers towards biosecurity. This paper provides empirical evidence on the impact of training intervention on biosecurity practices for disease prevention or control. In addition, it breaks down the components of the biosecurity practices and documents the specific challenges to its uptake by the farmers. It therefore relaxes the assumption of knowledge constraint as a barrier to uptake. The results clearly show that knowledge is not the binding constraint to uptake of the biosecurity interventions.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAfrican Swine FeverAnimalsFarmersFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleRegression AnalysisSwineUgandaAfrican swine feverbiosecurityparticipatory trainingpigUganda

Identifiers

PMID32311216
PMCPMC7754142
OpenAlexW3017196444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.