Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32310972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Efficacy and safety of XEN®-Implantation vs. trabeculectomy: Data of a "real-world" setting.

Felix Mathias Wagner, Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster, Julia Emmerich, Panagiotis Chronopoulos, Esther Maria Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Factors influencing the long-term-success of the XEN gel stent.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix Mathias WagnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9560-0524
Alexander Karl-Georg SchusterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Julia EmmerichDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Panagiotis ChronopoulosDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7524-2117
Esther Maria HoffmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare surgical success, postoperative intraocular pressure and complication rates between trabeculectomy and XEN gelstent surgery in a cohort of glaucoma patients in a typical clinical setting.

methodsA retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with refractory open-angle glaucoma including patients who underwent either stand-alone XEN gelstent insertion with Mitomycin C or trabeculectomy with Mitomycin C between 2016 and 2018 at the University Eye Hospital Mainz, Germany. Primary outcome measure was the proportion of surgical success 1 year after surgery. Patients with an IOP ≤18mmHg, an intraocular pressure reduction of >20% and in no need of revision surgery or topical medication were considered a complete surgical success. If topical therapy was necessary, they were considered a qualified success. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out for the primary outcome including gender, age, preoperative intraocular pressure and number of medication classes used preoperatively as adjustment variables.

results171 eyes of 144 patients were included, including 82 eyes of 58 patients in the XEN group and 89 eyes of 86 patients in the trabeculectomy group. The primary outcome defined as the proportion of surgical success after 1 year (mean 11.1 months ± 2.2) was similar for both groups. The complete success proportion was 65.5% (95%-CI: 55.6-75.9%) in the trabeculectomy group, and 58.5% (95%-CI: 47.6-69.4%) in the XEN group and not statistically different in our analysis model (crude OR = 0.61; 95%-CI: 0.31-1.22; adjusted OR = 0.66; 95%-CI: 0.32-1.37). The intraocular pressure reduction, as secondary outcome measure, was higher in the trabeculectomy group (10.5 mmHg) compared to the XEN group (7.2 mmHg; p = 0.003) at the 12-month follow-up.

conclusionBoth XEN gelstent implantation and trabeculectomy show similar proportions of surgical success and of complications and are therefore both recommendable for clinical routine. However, trabeculectomy seems to be more effective in lowering intraocular pressure than the XEN implantation. A prospective randomized clinical trial is necessary to evaluate differences in the long-term clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleGlaucoma Drainage ImplantsGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansHydrogelsMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsStentsTrabeculectomyTreatment OutcomeHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID32310972
PMCPMC7170231
OpenAlexW3017249708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.