Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32310943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effect of pulsed light on postharvest disease control-related metabolomic variation in melon (Cucumis melo) artificially inoculated with Fusarium pallidoroseum.

Francisco Oiram Filho, Ebenézer de Oliveira Silva, Mônica Maria de Almeida Lopes, Paulo Riceli Vasconselos Ribeiro, Andréia Hansen Oster, Jhonyson Arruda Carvalho Guedes, Dávila de Souza Zampieri, Patrícia do Nascimento Bordallo, Guilherme Julião Zocolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Oiram FilhoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Science Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Ebenézer de Oliveira SilvaMultiuser Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, EMBRAPA Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7396-6637
Mônica Maria de Almeida LopesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Science Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Paulo Riceli Vasconselos RibeiroMultiuser Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, EMBRAPA Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Andréia Hansen OsterPost Harvest Laboratory, EMBRAPA Uva e Vinho, Bento Gonçalves, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Jhonyson Arruda Carvalho GuedesDepartment of Analytical and Physical-Chemical Chemistry, Science Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8317-9338
Dávila de Souza ZampieriDepartment of Organic and Inorganic Chemistry, Science Center, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Patrícia do Nascimento BordalloMultiuser Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, EMBRAPA Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Guilherme Julião ZocoloMultiuser Laboratory of Natural Products Chemistry, EMBRAPA Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8835-0184
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed light, as a postharvest technology, is an alternative to traditional fungicides, and can be used on a wide variety of fruit and vegetables for sanitization or pathogen control. In addition to these applications, other effects also are detected in vegetal cells, including changes in metabolism and secondary metabolite production, which directly affect disease control response mechanisms. This study aimed to evaluate pulsed ultraviolet light in controlling postharvest rot, caused by Fusarium pallidoroseum in 'Spanish' melon, in natura, and its implications in disease control as a function of metabolomic variation to fungicidal or fungistatic effects. The dose of pulsed light (PL) that inhibited F. pallidoroseum growth in melons (Cucumis melo var. Spanish) was 9 KJ m-2. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled to a quadrupole-time-of-flight (QTOF) mass analyzer identified 12 compounds based on tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) fragmentation patterns. Chemometric analysis by Principal Components Analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Partial Least Squared Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) and corresponding S-Plot were used to evaluate the changes in fruit metabolism. PL technology provided protection against postharvest disease in melons, directly inhibiting the growth of F. pallidoroseum through the upregulation of specific fruit biomarkers such as pipecolic acid (11), saponarin (7), and orientin (3), which acted as major markers for the defense system against pathogens. PL can thus be proposed as a postharvest technology to prevent chemical fungicides and may be applied to reduce the decay of melon quality during its export and storage.

Indexed as

ApigeninCucurbitaceaeFlavonoidsFusariumGlucosidesMetabolomicsPipecolic AcidsPlant DiseasesUltraviolet RaysApigeninFlavonoidsGlucosidesorientinpipecolic acidPipecolic Acidssaponarin

Identifiers

PMID32310943
PMCPMC7170254
OpenAlexW3017019022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.