Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32310282›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Association Between Mode of First Delivery and Subsequent Fecundity and Fertility.

Kristen H Kjerulff, Ian M Paul, Carol S Weisman, Marianne M Hillemeier, Ming Wang, Richard S Legro, John T Repke

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Delivery mode and subsequent birth rate: A nationwide register-based analysis in Finland.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Parameters in Canines After Cesarean Sections.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristen H KjerulffDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Ian M PaulDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Carol S WeismanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Marianne M HillemeierDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Ming WangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Richard S LegroDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
John T RepkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Mode of First Delivery and Subsequent Child-BearingR01HD052990 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KJERULFF, KRISTEN HAWTHORNE · 2008 to 2012
$3.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: More than 20% of births globally are by cesarean delivery, including more than 30% in the US. Prior studies have reported lower rates of childbearing after cesarean delivery, but it is not clear if this is due to maternal choice or lower conception rates. Objective: To investigate the association between mode of first delivery and subsequent conceptions and live births. Design, Setting, and Participants: The First Baby Study was a multicenter prospective cohort study of women aged 18 to 35 years with singleton pregnancies, enrolled and interviewed before first childbirth, who delivered in Pennsylvania from 2009 to 2011 and were followed up for 36 months after delivery (until April 2014). Data analysis for this study took place between May and July 2019 and in January 2020. Exposures: Mode of first delivery (cesarean or vaginal). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of subsequent conceptions and live births. Discrete-time Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to compare the rate of subsequent conception (vaginal vs cesarean) among those who completed the 36-month survey, accounting for reported months of unprotected intercourse during the follow-up period and adjusting for relevant covariates. A log binomial regression was used to compare the age-adjusted rate of subsequent live birth (vaginal vs cesarean) among those who completed the 36-month survey. Results: The study population consisted of 2423 women who were retained to the 36-month survey (mean [SD] age at baseline was 27.2 [4.4] years and 712 [29.4%] delivered by cesarean). There were 2046 women who had unprotected intercourse during the follow-up period, 2021 of whom provided data on months of unprotected intercourse. Cesarean delivery was associated with lower rates of conception after unprotected intercourse during the follow-up period (413 of 599 [68.9%]) compared with vaginal delivery (1090 of 1422 [76.7%]) (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96). Cesarean delivery was also associated with reduced likelihood of a subsequent live birth (305 women [42.8%]) compared with vaginal delivery (857 women [50.1%]), with an age-adjusted risk ratio of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.92). Conclusions and Relevance: In the 3 years following first childbirth, women who delivered their first child by cesarean had lower rates of conception after unprotected intercourse, and fewer of these women had a second child than those who delivered vaginally.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32310282
PMCPMC7171551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.