Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32310086›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Distinct neural contributions to metacognition for detecting, but not discriminating visual stimuli.

Matan Mazor, Karl J Friston, Stephen M Fleming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Vivid imagery is reported faster than weak imagery.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Shared and Diverging Neural Dynamics Underlying False and Veridical Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Confidence in auditory perceptual completion.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025
    Article
  8. Inference About Absence as a Window Into the Mental Self-Model.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  9. Decoding and modifying dynamic attentional bias in gaming disorder.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Neural Correlates of Metacognition Impairment in Opioid Addiction.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Expectation Cues and False Percepts Generate Stimulus-Specific Activity in Distinct Layers of the Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Metacognitive awareness in the sound-induced flash illusion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Preserved Metacognition for Undetected Visuomotor Deviations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. What Does the Frontopolar Cortex Contribute to Goal-Directed Cognition and Action?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  19. Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matan MazorWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-0644
Karl J FristonWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7984-8909
Stephen M FlemingWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0233-4891

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206648/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being confident in whether a stimulus is present or absent (a detection judgment) is qualitatively distinct from being confident in the identity of that stimulus (a discrimination judgment). In particular, in detection, evidence can only be available for the presence, not the absence, of a target object. This asymmetry suggests that higher-order cognitive and neural processes may be required for confidence in detection, and more specifically, in judgments about absence. In a within-subject, pre-registered and performance-matched fMRI design, we observed quadratic confidence effects in frontopolar cortex for detection but not discrimination. Furthermore, in the right temporoparietal junction, confidence effects were enhanced for judgments of target absence compared to judgments of target presence. We interpret these findings as reflecting qualitative differences between a neural basis for metacognitive evaluation of detection and discrimination, potentially in line with counterfactual or higher-order models of confidence formation in detection.

Indexed as

JudgmentPhotic StimulationAdolescentAdultDecision MakingDiscrimination LearningFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMetacognitionPrefrontal CortexYoung Adultconfidencedecision-makinghumanmetacognitionneuroscienceself-monitoringsignal detection theory

Identifiers

PMID32310086
PMCPMC7170652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.