Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309758›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Utility of Distal Forearm DXA as a Screening Tool for Primary Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Case-Control Study.

Satoshi Miyamura, Kohji Kuriyama, Kosuke Ebina, Kunihiro Oka, Masafumi Kashii, Atsuo Shigi, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Makoto Hirao, Hideki Yoshikawa, Tsuyoshi Murase

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Best Performance Parameters of HR-pQCT to Predict Fragility Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. New Challenges: Use and Interpretation of Radius Bone Mineral Density.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Review
  9. Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2024
    Article
  10. Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoshi MiyamuraDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Kohji KuriyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Kosuke EbinaDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Kunihiro OkaDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Masafumi KashiiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Atsuo ShigiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroyuki TanakaDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Makoto HiraoDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Hideki YoshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan.
Tsuyoshi MuraseDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery (S.M., K.E., K.O., H.T., M.H., and T.M.), Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine (K.E.), and Sports Medical Science (H.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPToyonaka Municipal Hospital · JPHarvard University · USYukioka Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoporotic fragility fractures frequently occur at the distal part of the radius. This suggests that initial osteoporosis evaluation at this site may inform screening and treatment to prevent additional fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of distal forearm dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a screening tool to assess the risk of fragility fractures at the distal part of the radius.

methodsThis retrospective, case-control study included postmenopausal women who had sustained a distal radial fracture (fracture group, n = 110) and postmenopausal women with no history of fracture (control group, n = 95). DXA measurements at the spine, hip, and distal part of the forearm (ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal sections) were compared between the groups on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD), T-score, and the proportion of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 standard deviations (SD). We also investigated the regional differences on the basis of T-score among the skeletal sites. Furthermore, the reliability of distal forearm DXA measurements was validated by assessing the statistical correlation (r) with volumetric BMD by computed tomography (CT).

resultsCompared with the control group, the fracture group showed significantly lower BMD and T-scores and higher proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD at the ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal forearm; however, the spine and hip measurements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. With respect to regional differences, in the fracture group, T-scores were significantly lower and the proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD were significantly higher for the 3 distal forearm sites compared with the spine and hip. DXA measurements at all 3 of the distal forearm regions exhibited high correlation with volumetric BMD by CT (r = 0.83 to 0.92).

conclusionsSome postmenopausal women were found to exhibit bone loss preferentially at the distal part of the radius, which may render them vulnerable to fragility fractures. Forearm DXA for the assessment of local bone loss may demonstrate benefit in screening for those at risk for distal radial fractures and facilitate the early identification of patients who require intervention for osteoporosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID32309758
PMCPMC7147634
OpenAlexW2999622998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.