ArticleJB & JS open access
Utility of Distal Forearm DXA as a Screening Tool for Primary Osteoporotic Fragility Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Case-Control Study.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global and regional prevalence of osteopenia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- The correlation between bone mineral density measured at the forearm and at the lumbar spine or femoral neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Best Performance Parameters of HR-pQCT to Predict Fragility Fracture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2021Pooled it
- Imaging the joint above and below: investigating the need for "completion imaging" in geriatric fragility distal radius fractures.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Low forearm bone density as a clue to suspect primary hyperparathyroidism in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a retrospective study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Imaging of the Skeletal System: Overview of Applications in Human and Veterinary Medicine.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Trabecular bone score to assess bone microarchitecture in end-stage renal disease patients.Archives of osteoporosis · 2025Article
- New Challenges: Use and Interpretation of Radius Bone Mineral Density.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
- Personalized Approaches to Spine Surgery.International journal of spine surgery · 2024Article
- Associations between ultra-distal forearm bone mineral density and incident fracture in women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024Article
- Regional variation in bone mineral density of the distal radius.Osteoporosis and sarcopenia · 2024Article
- Article
- Opportunistic hand radiographs to screen for low forearm bone mineral density: a prospective and retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Osteoporosis Prediction Using Machine-Learned Optical Bone Densitometry Data.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- The effect of forearm rotation on the bone mineral density measurements of the distal radius.Journal of bone and mineral metabolism · 2024Article
- The clinical necessity of a distal forearm DEXA scan for predicting distal radius fracture in elderly females: a retrospective case-control study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis.Journal of osteoporosis · 2023Article
- Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of reduction loss in distal radius fractures treated with cast immobilization.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Rates of Osteoporosis Management and Secondary Preventative Treatment After Primary Fragility Fractures.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporotic fragility fractures frequently occur at the distal part of the radius. This suggests that initial osteoporosis evaluation at this site may inform screening and treatment to prevent additional fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of distal forearm dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as a screening tool to assess the risk of fragility fractures at the distal part of the radius.
methodsThis retrospective, case-control study included postmenopausal women who had sustained a distal radial fracture (fracture group, n = 110) and postmenopausal women with no history of fracture (control group, n = 95). DXA measurements at the spine, hip, and distal part of the forearm (ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal sections) were compared between the groups on the basis of bone mineral density (BMD), T-score, and the proportion of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 standard deviations (SD). We also investigated the regional differences on the basis of T-score among the skeletal sites. Furthermore, the reliability of distal forearm DXA measurements was validated by assessing the statistical correlation (r) with volumetric BMD by computed tomography (CT).
resultsCompared with the control group, the fracture group showed significantly lower BMD and T-scores and higher proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD at the ultra-distal, mid-distal, and one-third distal forearm; however, the spine and hip measurements did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. With respect to regional differences, in the fracture group, T-scores were significantly lower and the proportions of patients with a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD were significantly higher for the 3 distal forearm sites compared with the spine and hip. DXA measurements at all 3 of the distal forearm regions exhibited high correlation with volumetric BMD by CT (r = 0.83 to 0.92).
conclusionsSome postmenopausal women were found to exhibit bone loss preferentially at the distal part of the radius, which may render them vulnerable to fragility fractures. Forearm DXA for the assessment of local bone loss may demonstrate benefit in screening for those at risk for distal radial fractures and facilitate the early identification of patients who require intervention for osteoporosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.