Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309594›Full record

ReviewDiscoveries (Craiova, Romania)2017

Artificial Intelligence versus Doctors' Intelligence: A Glance on Machine Learning Benefaction in Electrocardiography.

Victor Ponomariov, Liviu Chirila, Florentina-Mihaela Apipie, Raffaele Abate, Mihaela Rusu, Zhuojun Wu, Elisa A Liehn, Ilie Bucur

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discoveries (Craiova, Romania), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Victor PonomariovInstitute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Liviu ChirilaECUORE LTD, London, England.
Florentina-Mihaela ApipieApplied Systems srl, Craiova, Romania.
Raffaele AbateECUORE LTD, London, England.
Mihaela RusuInstitute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Zhuojun WuInstitute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Elisa A LiehnInstitute for Molecular Cardiovascular Research (IMCAR), RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Ilie BucurApplied Systems, Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational machine learning, especially self-enhancing algorithms, prove remarkable effectiveness in applications, including cardiovascular medicine. This review summarizes and cross-compares the current machine learning algorithms applied to electrocardiogram interpretation. In practice, continuous real-time monitoring of electrocardiograms is still difficult to realize. Furthermore, automated ECG interpretation by implementing specific artificial intelligence algorithms is even more challenging. By collecting large datasets from one individual, computational approaches can assure an efficient personalized treatment strategy, such as a correct prediction on patient-specific disease progression, therapeutic success rate and limitations of certain interventions, thus reducing the hospitalization costs and physicians' workload. Clearly such aims can be achieved by a perfect symbiosis of a multidisciplinary team involving clinicians, researchers and computer scientists. Summarizing, continuous cross-examination between machine intelligence and human intelligence is a combination of precision, rationale and high-throughput scientific engine integrated into a challenging framework of big data science.

Indexed as

algorithmsartificial intelligenceautonomic learningcomputational modelsmachine intelligencemachine learningmultiple processing layers

Identifiers

PMID32309594
PMCPMC6941587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.