ReviewDiscoveries (Craiova, Romania)2017
Drug repositioning: computational approaches and research examples classified according to the evidence level.
Review in Discoveries (Craiova, Romania), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Repositioning Drugs: A Computational Approach.Current drug research reviews · 2026Review
- Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease Associated with Programmed Cell Death Reveal Four Repurposed Drugs.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Increasing need for novel drugs and their application for treating diseases are the main reasons for the development of bioinformatics platforms for drug repositioning. The use of existing approved drugs for treating other diseases reduces cost and time needed for a drug to come to clinical use. Different strategies for drug repositioning have been reported. The use of several omics types is becoming increasingly important in drug repositioning. Although there are several public databases intended for drug repositioning, not many successful cases of novel use of drugs have been reported in the literature and transferred to clinical use. Additionally, the study approaches in published literature are very heterogeneous. A classification scheme - Drug Repositioning Evidence Level (DREL) - for drug repositioning projects, according to the level of scientific evidence has been proposed previously. In the present study, we have reviewed main databases and bioinformatics approaches enabling drug repositioning studies. We also reviewed six published studies and evaluated them according to the DREL classification. The evaluated cases used drug repositioning approach for therapy of rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, coronary artery disease, diabetes, and gulf war illness. The drug repositioning study field could benefit from clearer definition in published articles therefore including drug repositioning DREL classification scheme could be included in published original and review studies. Novel bioinformatics approaches to improve prediction of drug-target interactions, continuous updating of the databases, and development of novel validation techniques are needed to facilitate the development of the drug repositioning field. Although there are still many challenges in drug repositioning and personalized medicine, stratification of patients based on their molecular signatures and testing of signature-targeting drugs should improve drug efficacy in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.