Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309545›Full record

ReviewDiscoveries (Craiova, Romania)2014

DNA bending in the synaptic complex in V(D)J recombination: turning an ancestral transpososome upside down.

Mihai Ciubotaru, Marius Surleac, Mihaela G Musat, Andreea M Rusu, Elena Ionita, Paul C C Albu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Discoveries (Craiova, Romania), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 88% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mihai CiubotaruDepartment of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 300 Cedar St., TAC S620, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Marius SurleacDepartment of Bioinformatics and Structural Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry of the Romanian Academy, Splaiul Independentei 296, 060031, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela G MusatNational Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Horia Hulubei, Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Atomistilor Str., 077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Andreea M RusuNational Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Horia Hulubei, Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Atomistilor Str., 077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Elena IonitaNational Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Horia Hulubei, Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Atomistilor Str., 077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Paul C C AlbuNational Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering Horia Hulubei, Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Atomistilor Str., 077125, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Horia Hulubei National Institute for R and D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering · RORomanian Academy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all jawed vertebrates RAG (recombination activating gene) recombinase orchestrates V(D)J recombination in B and T lymphocyte precursors, assembling the V, D and J germline gene segments into continuous functional entities which encode the variable regions of their immune receptors. V(D)J recombination is the process by which most of the diversity of our specific immune receptors is acquired and is thought to have originated by domestication of a transposon in the genome of a vertebrate.  RAG acts similarly to the cut and paste transposases, by first binding two recombination signal DNA sequences (RSSs), which flank the two coding genes to be adjoined, in a process called synaptic or paired complex (PC) formation. At these RSS-coding borders, RAG first nicks one DNA strand, then creates hairpins, thus cleaving the duplex DNA at both RSSs. Although RAG reaction mechanism resembles that of insect mobile element transposases and RAG itself can inefficiently perform intramolecular and intermolecular integration into the target DNA, inside the nuclei of the developing lymphocytes transposition is extremely rare and is kept under proper surveillance. Our review may help understand how RAG synaptic complex organization prevents deleterious transposition. The phosphoryl transfer reaction mechanism of RNAseH-like fold DDE motif enzymes, including RAG, is discussed accentuating the peculiarities described for various transposases from the light of their available high resolution structures (Tn5, Mu, Mos1 and Hermes). Contrasting the structural 3D organization of DNA in these transpososomes with that of the RSSs-DNA in RAG PC allows us to propose several clues for how evolutionarily RAG may have become "specialized" in recombination versus transposition.

Indexed as

mobile elements in human genomephosphoryl transfer reactionRAGRAG1recombination versus transpositiontransposonVDJ recombination

Identifiers

PMID32309545
PMCPMC6941560
OpenAlexW2140696840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.