ArticleJournal of diabetes research2020
Annexin V
Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endothelial Microparticles as Potential Biomarkers in the Assessment of Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypercholesterolemia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Thrombopoietin Contributes to Enhanced Platelet Activation in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Relation between interleukin-13 and annexin-V levels and carotid intima-media thickness in nephrotic syndrome.Journal of circulating biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 1 diabetes is a chronic disease including hyperglycemia and accelerated atherosclerosis, with high risk of micro- and macrovascular complications. Circulating microvesicles (cMVs) are procoagulant cell fragments shed during activation/apoptosis and discussed to be markers of vascular dysfunction and hypercoagulability. Limited knowledge exists on hypercoagulability in young diabetics. We aimed to investigate cMVs over a five-year period in children/adolescents with type 1 diabetes compared with controls and any associations with glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors. We hypothesized increased shedding of cMVs in type 1 diabetes in response to vascular activation.
methodsThe cohort included type 1 diabetics (
resultsComparable levels of Annexin V (AV
conclusionsChildren/adolescents with type 1 diabetes show similar levels of AV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.