Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309424›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2020

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lu Chen, Ling Ye, Hui Liu, Pingliang Yang, Bangxiang Yang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, ultrasound therapy, and corticosteroid injections for treatment of lateral epicondylitis: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Cryotherapy in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Avoiding Hallux Sesamoidectomy: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu ChenDepartment of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-7881
Ling YeDepartment of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7558-8940
Hui LiuDepartment of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Pingliang YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Xindu, Sichuan 610500, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8572-3800
Bangxiang YangDepartment of Pain Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis is the most common musculoskeletal disease. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy had shown an effect on osteoarthritis in both some animal experiments and clinical studies, but there was no systematic review to confirm the value of shockwave therapy in the treatment of all types of osteoarthritis and compare it with other traditional therapies (especially traditional Chinese medicine).

methodPubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, and VIP database were searched up to December 10, 2019, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing shockwave therapy and other treatments for osteoarthritis. Visual analogue scale and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were extracted and analyzed by RevMan and STATA software as outcomes of pain reduction and functional improvement. Adverse reactions were recorded to evaluate the safety of shockwave therapy.

resultsShockwave therapy had significant improvement in both pain reduction and functional improvement compared with placebo, corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, medication, and ultrasound (

conclusionsExtracorporeal shockwave therapy could be recommended in the treatment of osteoarthritis as a noninvasive therapy with safety and effectiveness, but the grade of recommendations needs to be discussed in a further study.

Indexed as

AnimalsDatabases, FactualExtracorporeal Shockwave TherapyHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularMedicine, Chinese TraditionalOsteoarthritisOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain MeasurementPlacebosPlatelet-Rich PlasmaUltrasonic TherapyHyaluronic AcidPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID32309424
PMCPMC7104126
OpenAlexW3012281863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.