Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309354›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Predicting pathological complete response in rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy with a random forest using

Wei-Chih Shen, Shang-Wen Chen, Kuo-Chen Wu, Peng-Yi Lee, Chun-Lung Feng, Te-Chun Hsieh, Kuo-Yang Yen, Chia-Hung Kao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Uncover This Tech Term: Random Forest.Korean journal of radiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Predictive value ofReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Radiomics in colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Predictive Value ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei-Chih ShenDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung.
Shang-Wen ChenCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Kuo-Chen WuCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Peng-Yi LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Chun-Lung FengDivision of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Te-Chun HsiehDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Kuo-Yang YenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and PET Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
Chia-Hung KaoCenter of Augmented Intelligence in Healthcare, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung.
China Medical University · TWChina Medical University Hospital · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. This study developed a random forest (RF) model to predict pathological complete response (pCR) based on radiomics derived from baseline

methodsThis study included 169 patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer. All patients received

resultsAfter NCRT, 22 patients (13%) achieved pCR, and 42 features that could differentiate tumors with pCR were used to construct the RF model. Six decision trees and seven splits were suitable. Accordingly, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 81.8%, 97.3%, 81.8%, 97.3%, and 95.3%, respectively.

conclusionsBy using an RF, we determined that radiomics derived from baseline

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG)artificial intelligencecomputed tomography (CT)machine learningpathological complete responsepositron emission tomography (PET)radiomicsrandom forest (RF)rectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID32309354
PMCPMC7154452
OpenAlexW3010991925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.