ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020
Comparison of radius of anterior lens surface curvature measurements
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo characterization of morphologic changes in the lens during accommodation as a function of age by use of OCT with swept-source technology.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Modelling eye lengths and refractions in the periphery.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2023Article
- Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of phacoemulsification (ultrasound) cataract surgery on the dynamics of the anterior segment of primary angle closure by AS-OCT.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- The Structure of the Lens and Its Associations with the Visual Quality.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assess the radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL) measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) in comparison with Scheimpflug imaging.
methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional study was carried out at Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangzhou, China. We enrolled 59 eyes, including 30 eyes from 30 cataractous volunteers (59 to 87 years) and 29 eyes from 29 young participants (19 to 49 years). After mydriasis, the RAL was measured automatically by the built-in software in the AS-OCT (CASIA 2). The Scheimpflug images were measured with the build-in caliper tool of the Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), and RAL were further calculated with the principle of best-fitted circle. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of RAL measurement using Scheimpflug camera were evaluated with limit of agreement (LoA) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Consistency between RAL measurement of Scheimpflug camera and AS-OCT were assessed with LoA, correlation analysis and linear regression.
resultsFor all subjects, intraobserver (LoA: -0.25 to 0.23 mm, ICC: 0.996) and interobserver reproducibility (LoA: -0.85 to 0.92 mm, ICC: 0.947) of RAL were good using Scheimpflug imaging. Both AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging found that the age-related cataract participants had smaller RAL (P=0.010, P=0.001 respectively). LoA of RAL measurement between AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging was -3.83 to -0.79 mm, and the Pearson correlation efficient was 0.909 (P<0.001). The RAL values measured by AS-OCT were significantly greater than that by Scheimpflug camera with a mean difference of 2.31 mm for all participants (P<0.001). The RAL measurement could be converted using the equation: Y
conclusionsBoth Scheimpflug camera system with internal caliper tool and the AS-OCT are fast and non-contact tools that could measure RAL successfully. The two measurement results are highly correlated and interchangeable through linear regression equation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.