ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Association between corneal biomechanical parameters and myopic refractive errors in young Indian individuals.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical changes in keratoconus after customized stromal augmentation.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyTrial
- Age-related analysis of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Chinese individuals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Characterization of Corneal Biomechanics Using CORVIS ST Device in Different Grades of Myopia in a Sample of Middle Eastern Ethnicity.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Refractive associations with corneal biomechanical properties among young adults: a population-based Corvis ST study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Effect of ocular biometric factors on corneal biomechanical properties.International ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Unraveling the mechanobiology of cornea: From bench side to the clinic.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Assessment of corneal biomechanics in anisometropia using Scheimpflug technology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Myopia in India.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Short term changes in corneal stress-strain index and other corneal biomechanical parameters post-laser in situ keratomileusis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Highly Myopic Patients With Asymmetric Myopic Atrophic Maculopathy-Analysis Using Multimodal Imaging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Age-related variation in corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy Indians.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020Article
- Corneal stress-strain index in myopic Indian population.Oman journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- Role of corneal epithelial mapping, Corvis biomechanical index, and artificial intelligence-based tomographic biomechanical index in diagnosing spectrum of keratoconus.Oman journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report corneal biomechanical parameters in young myopic Indian individuals.
methodsIt is a retrospective study where young myopic individuals aged between 19 and 36 years who have undergone corneal biomechanics assessment using Corvis ST between January 2017 and December 2017 were enrolled. Individuals with central corneal thickness (CCT) <500 microns, intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mmHg, history of any systemic and ocular disease, any previous ocular surgery, high astigmatism, corneal disease such as keratoconus, poor scans quality, and individuals with any missing data were also excluded. Corneal biomechanical parameters were noted in mild to moderate and high myopia.
resultsWe analyzed the 266 eyes of 266 myopic individuals, of which 167 and 99 eyes had mild to moderate and high myopia, respectively. All the individuals were matched for age, IOP, and CCT (
conclusionsHigh myopic eyes showed a significantly higher maximum deflection amplitude, lesser A2 time and HC time, less A2DA, smaller HC radius than mild to moderate myopia indicating softer, more deformable corneas. However, better predictor of corneal biomechanics such as Stiffness parameters at A1 (SPA1), DA ratio max, integrated radius, and Corvis Biomechanical Index were similar among both the groups of myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.