Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309046›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The whole body transcriptome of

Dongbai Wang, Jing Tao, Pengfei Lu, Youqing Luo, Ping Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongbai WangForestry College, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jing TaoBeijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Pengfei LuBeijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Youqing LuoBeijing Key Laboratory for Forest Pest Control, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Ping HuForestry College, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1713-063X
Beijing Forestry University · CNGuangxi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tiny casebearer moth

methodsWe investigated the whole body transcriptome of

resultsWe identified 16 odorant binding proteins, 14 chemosensory proteins, three sensory neuron membrane proteins, six odorant degrading enzymes, five antennal esterases, 13 odorant receptors, seven ionotropic receptors and 10 gustatory receptors, including three PBPs and one odorant co-receptor. Additionally, three putative pheromone receptors, two bitter gustatory receptors and five functional ionotropic receptors were found by phylogenetic analysis. The expression profiles of three PBPs in males and females showed that all of them exhibited male-specific expression and two were expressed at significantly higher levels in males. These data provide a molecular foundation from which to explore the olfactory recognition process and may be useful in the development of a new integrated pest management strategy targeting olfactory recognition of

Indexed as

Chemosensory proteinsIonotropic receptorsOdorant binding proteinsOdorant-degrading enzymesOdorant receptorsSensory neuron membrane proteinsWhole body transcriptome

Identifiers

PMID32309046
PMCPMC7153557
OpenAlexW3015323805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.