Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32309035›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2020

Apraxia of speech involves lesions of dorsal arcuate fasciculus and insula in patients with aphasia.

Karen Chenausky, Sébastien Paquette, Andrea Norton, Gottfried Schlaug

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Refined Operational Definitions for the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2025
    Article
  5. The neuroanatomy of Broca's aphasia.Frontiers in language sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Auditory representation of learned sound sequences in motor regions of the macaque brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen ChenauskySargent College (KC), Boston University; Department of Neurology (KC, SP, GS), Harvard Medical School; and Music, Neuroimaging, and Stroke Recovery Laboratory (KC, SP, AN, GS), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Sébastien PaquetteSargent College (KC), Boston University; Department of Neurology (KC, SP, GS), Harvard Medical School; and Music, Neuroimaging, and Stroke Recovery Laboratory (KC, SP, AN, GS), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Andrea NortonSargent College (KC), Boston University; Department of Neurology (KC, SP, GS), Harvard Medical School; and Music, Neuroimaging, and Stroke Recovery Laboratory (KC, SP, AN, GS), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Gottfried SchlaugSargent College (KC), Boston University; Department of Neurology (KC, SP, GS), Harvard Medical School; and Music, Neuroimaging, and Stroke Recovery Laboratory (KC, SP, AN, GS), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
Boston University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Advanced Research Training in Communication Sciences and DisordersT32DC013017 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Cara E. Stepp · 2016 to 2026
$4.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC013017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the contributions of apraxia of speech (AOS) and anomia to conversational dysfluency.

methodsIn this observational study of 52 patients with chronic aphasia, 47 with concomitant AOS, fluency was quantified using correct information units per minute (CIUs/min) from propositional speech tasks. Videos of patients performing conversational, how-to and picture-description tasks, word and sentence repetition, and diadochokinetic tasks were used to diagnose AOS using the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS). Anomia was quantified by patients' scores on the 30 even-numbered items from the Boston Naming Test (BNT).

resultsTogether, ASRS and BNT scores accounted for 51.4% of the total variance in CIUs/min; the ASRS score accounted for the majority of that variance. The BNT score was associated with lesions in the left superior temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and large parts of the insula. The global ASRS score was associated with lesions in the left dorsal arcuate fasciculus (AF), pre- and post-central gyri, and both banks of the central sulcus of the insula. The ASRS score for the primary distinguishing features of AOS (no overlap with features of aphasia) was associated with less AF and more insular involvement. Only ∼27% of this apraxia-specific lesion overlapped with lesions associated with the BNT score. Lesions associated with AOS had minimal overlap with the frontal aslant tract (FAT) (<1%) or the extreme capsule fiber tract (1.4%). Finally, ASRS scores correlated significantly with damage to the insula but not to the AF, extreme capsule, or FAT.

conclusionsResults are consistent with previous findings identifying lesions of the insula and AF in patients with AOS, damage to both of which may create dysfluency in patients with aphasia.

Identifiers

PMID32309035
PMCPMC7156201
OpenAlexW2964611172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.