ReviewJournal of ophthalmic & vision research
Screening for Novel
Review in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Five novelZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025Article
- Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Association of 2 Lysyl Oxidase Gene Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Keratoconus: A Nationwide Registration Study.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
- Role of Oxidative Stress in Ocular Diseases: A Balancing Act.Metabolites · 2023Review
- The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022Article
- Potential underlying genetic associations between keratoconus and diabetes mellitus.Advances in ophthalmology practice and research · 2021Article
- Further evaluation of differential expression of keratoconus candidate genes in human corneas.PeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the presence of the variants of lysyl oxygenase (
methodsDonor genomic DNA extracted from blood samples was screened for 5'UTR, exonic
resultsWe found an unreported missense variant in
conclusionWe described three novel LOX polymorphisms identified for the first time in Brazilian patients with advanced keratoconus, as well as a previously described
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.