Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308916›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

An Interprofessional Approach to Clinical Workflow Evaluation Focused on the Electronic Health Record Using Time motion Study Methods.

Jessica Schwartz, Jonathan Elias, Cody Slater, Kenrick Cato, Sarah Collins Rossetti

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica SchwartzColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Jonathan EliasColumbia University Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Cody SlaterColumbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.
Kenrick CatoColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Sarah Collins RossettiColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Columbia University · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Documentation burden has become an increasing concern as the prevalence of electronic health records (EHRs) has grown. The implementation of a new EHR is an opportunity to measure and improve documentation burden, as well as assess the role of the EHR in clinician workflow. Time-motion observation is the preferred method for evaluating workflow. In this study, we developed and tested the reliability of an interprofessional taxonomy for use in time-motion observation of nursing and physician workflow before and after a new EHR is implemented at a large academic medical center. Inter-observer reliability assessment sessions were conducted while observing both nurses and physicians. Four out of five observers achieved reliability in an average of 5.75 sessions. Our developed taxonomy demonstrated to be reliable for conducting workflow evaluation of both nurses and physicians, with a focus on time and tasks in the EHR.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsMedical Staff, HospitalNursing Staff, HospitalTime and Motion StudiesWorkflowAcademic Medical CentersCommunicationHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID32308916
PMCPMC7153105
OpenAlexW3027635297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.