Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308882›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

De-identification of Clinical Text via Bi-LSTM-CRF with Neural Language Models.

Buzhou Tang, Dehuan Jiang, Qingcai Chen, Xiaolong Wang, Jun Yan, Ying Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving domain adaptation in de-identification of electronic health records through self-training.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Buzhou TangKey Laboratory of Network Oriented Intelligent Computation, Harbin Institute of Tech-nology, Shenzhen, China.
Dehuan JiangKey Laboratory of Network Oriented Intelligent Computation, Harbin Institute of Tech-nology, Shenzhen, China.
Qingcai ChenKey Laboratory of Network Oriented Intelligent Computation, Harbin Institute of Tech-nology, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaolong WangKey Laboratory of Network Oriented Intelligent Computation, Harbin Institute of Tech-nology, Shenzhen, China.
Jun YanYidu Cloud (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ying ShenYing Shen, Peking University, Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De-identification of clinical text, the prerequisite of electronic clinical data reuse, is a typical named entity recogni tion (NER) problem. A number of state-of-the-art deep learning methods for NER, such as Bi-LSTM-CRF (bidirec tional long-short-term-memory conditional random fields), have been applied for de-identification. Neural language models used for language representation bring great improvement in lots of NLP tasks when they are integrated with other deep learning methods. In this paper, we introduce Bi-LSTM-CRF with neural language models for de- identification of clinical text, and evaluate it on the de-identification datasets of the i2b2 2014 and the CEGS N- GRID 2016 challenges. Four neural language models of three types individually integrated with Bi-LSTM-CRF are compared in this study. Bi-LSTM-CRF with neural language models achieves the highest "strict" micro-averaged F1-score of 95.50% on the i2b2 2014 dataset and 91.82% on the CEGS N-GRID 2016 dataset, becoming new benchmark results on these two datasets respectively

Indexed as

Data AnonymizationNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningLanguage

Identifiers

PMID32308882
PMCPMC7153082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.