Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308878›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

Comparing Deep Learning Models for Multi-cell Classification in Liquid- based Cervical Cytology Image.

Sudhir Sornapudi, Gregory T Brown, Zhiyun Xue, Rodney Long, Lisa Allen, Sameer Antani

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting Molecular Subtype and Survival of Rhabdomyosarcoma Patients Using Deep Learning of H&E Images: A Report from the Children's Oncology Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudhir SornapudiMissouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, USA.
Gregory T BrownLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Zhiyun XueLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Rodney LongLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lisa AllenDiagnostic Systems Women's Health and Cancer, Becton Dickinson and Company, Durham, NC, USA.
Sameer AntaniLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, U.S. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
National Center for Biotechnology Information · USMissouri University of Science and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is a reliable automated technique for the screening of Papanicolaou (Pap) smear data. It is an effective technique for collecting a majority of the cervical cells and aiding cytopathologists in locating abnormal cells. Most methods published in the research literature rely on accurate cell segmentation as a prior, which remains challenging due to a variety of factors, e.g., stain consistency, presence of clustered cells, etc. We propose a method for automatic classification of cervical slide images through generation of labeled cervical patch data and extracting deep hierarchical features by fine-tuning convolution neural networks, as well as a novel graph-based cell detection approach for cellular level evaluation. The results show that the proposed pipeline can classify images of both single cell and overlapping cells. The VGG-19 model is found to be the best at classifying the cervical cytology patch data with 95 % accuracy under precision-recall curve.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPapanicolaou TestCervix UteriDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC CurveUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID32308878
PMCPMC7153123
OpenAlexW3027001786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.