ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019
Have ICD-10 Coding Practices Changed Since 2015?
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multidimensional hierarchical framework for sources of bias in real-world healthcare evidence: a scoping review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2026Article
- With big data comes big responsibility: Strategies for utilizing aggregated, standardized, de-identified electronic health record data for research.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Volume and distribution of white matter hyperintensities in rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluating a Natural Language Processing-Driven, AI-Assisted International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification, Coding System for Diagnosis Related Groups in a Real Hospital Environment: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Trends in ICD-10-CM-Coded Administrative Datasets for Injury Surveillance and Research.Southern medical journal · 2022Review
- Coding Disparity and Specificity during Emergency Department Visits after Transitioning to the Tenth Version of the International Classification of Diseases.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022Article
- Pandemics: Historically Slow "Learning Curve" Leading to Biomedical Informatics and Vaccine Breakthroughs.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparison of Diagnosis Codes to Clinical Notes in Classifying Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Usage of ICD-10 codes in administrative data has continued to shift since mandatory adoption in 2015. Identifying changing patterns in coding behavior is imperative in producing reliable analyses and robust conclusions. We examined the granularity of ICD-10 coding over time in a cohort selected from the IBM Explorys Therapeutic Dataset, which contains the records of over 60 million patients. Our seasonality-aware trend model identified patterns of interest, such as increased use of laterality codes for pain and increased use of codes denoting concepts novel to ICD- 10 for screening encounters. Those relying on these codes should adjust for these 'learning curve' effects. This work should be extended to additional modalities of terminology usage and represents a starting point for researchers working with dynamic clinical ontologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32308876PMC7153097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.