Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308868›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

A High Recall Classifier for Selecting Articles for MEDLINE Indexing.

Alastair R Rae, Max E Savery, James G Mork, Dina Demner-Fushman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Goals and strategies for the indexing of publication types and study designs.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Automatic MeSH Indexing: Revisiting the Subheading Attachment Problem.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alastair R RaeLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
Max E SaveryLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
James G MorkLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.
Dina Demner-FushmanLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MEDLINE is the National Library of Medicine's premier bibliographic database for biomedical literature. A highly valuable feature of the database is that each record is manually indexed with a controlled vocabulary called MeSH. Most MEDLINE journals are indexed cover-to-cover, but there are about 200 selectively indexed journals for which only articles related to biomedicine and life sciences are indexed. In recent years, the selection process has become an increasing burden for indexing staff, and this paper presents a machine learning based system that offers very significant time savings by semi-automating the task. At the core of the system is a high recall classifier for the identification of journal articles that are in-scope for MEDLINE. The system is shown to reduce the number of articles requiring manual review by 54%, equivalent to approximately 40,000 articles per year.

Indexed as

Abstracting and IndexingMachine LearningMEDLINENeural Networks, ComputerMedical Subject HeadingsNational Library of Medicine (U.S.)United States

Identifiers

PMID32308868
PMCPMC7153058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.