Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308838›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

Disseminating Strengths-Oriented Best Practices in Diabetes Care Utilizing a Standardized Language within a Global Community.

Grace Gao, Madeleine Kerr, Sarah Beman, Candice Bruhjell, Joyce Rudenick, Onkar Singh, Mehrdad Rafiei, Karen A Monsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grace GaoSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Madeleine KerrUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Sarah BemanSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Candice BruhjellSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Joyce RudenickSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Onkar SinghSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Mehrdad RafieiSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Karen A MonsenSaint Catherine University, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes is a manageable chronic condition that contributes significantly to the global health burden of diseases and mandates a global collective effort to create an effective solution. This paper describes a community diabetes care pathway built upon a Strengths-Oriented Global Health Informatics Framework and an interdisciplinary standardized terminology, the Omaha System, along with a related translational process to disseminate best practices in diabetes care in China. This project demonstrates a novel strengths-oriented collaborative approach to disseminate best practices of diabetes management in global health communities and offers a potential to bring person-centered coordinated care to multi-levels of engagement that generate actionable and measurable results. Such collaboration opens a continued dialogue in the discourse for constructing global health informatics principles and practice to reduce the burden of diseases around the world.

Indexed as

Medical InformaticsPractice Guidelines as TopicVocabulary, ControlledChinaDiabetes MellitusGlobal HealthHumansInformation DisseminationInternational CooperationPatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID32308838
PMCPMC7153156
OpenAlexW4293111128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.