Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308825›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2019

Leveraging Clinical Expertise as a Feature - not an Outcome - of Predictive Models: Evaluation of an Early Warning System Use Case.

Sarah Collins Rossetti, Chris Knaplund, Dave Albers, Abdul Tariq, Kui Tang, David Vawdrey, Natalie H Yip, Patricia C Dykes, Jeffrey G Klann, Min Jeoung Kang and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Empirical Findings on the Role of Structured Data, Unstructured Data, and their Combination for Automatic Clinical Phenotyping.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Collins RossettiColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Chris KnaplundColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Dave AlbersColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Abdul TariqNew York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
Kui TangNew York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
David VawdreyColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Natalie H YipColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Patricia C DykesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jeffrey G KlannHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Min Jeoung KangBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jose GarciaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Li-Heng FuColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Kumiko SchnockBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Kenrick CatoColumbia University, School of Nursing, New York, NY.
Columbia University · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USHarvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN)R01NR016941 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kenrick Dwain Cato, Sarah Collins Rossetti · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying patients at risk of deterioration in the hospital and intervening more quickly to prevent adverse events is a top patient safety priority. Early warning scores (EWS) identify at risk patients, but there is much opportunity for improvement particularly related to increasing lead time - the time from an alert trigger to adverse event (e.g., cardiac arrest, death). Our team develops healthcare process models of clinical concern (HPM-CC) and in this work has identified documentation signals that are proxies of nurses concern and can be used to predict patient risk earlier than current EWS systems that rely only on physiological data. We compared the performance of a validated EWS - the MEWS - to our novel model (MEWS-CC) comprised of MEWS criteria plus 3 proxy variables of nursing concern. MEWS-CC performed similarly to MEWS, with the added benefit of increased the time from EWS trigger to event by 5-26 hours.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEarly DiagnosisElectronic Health RecordsModels, BiologicalMonitoring, PhysiologicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDocumentationFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNursing Staff, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID32308825
PMCPMC7153052
OpenAlexW3027121256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.