ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2020
Chemical Peels in Skin Cancer: A Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- TCA chemical peel as facial anti-aging therapy for postmenopausal women: a randomised clinical study.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2025Article
- Article
- Skin cancer: understanding the journey of transformation from conventional to advanced treatment approaches.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- Tirbanibulin for Actinic Keratosis: Insights into the Mechanism of Action.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Review
- Wounding Therapies for Prevention of Photocarcinogenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Management Pearls on the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses and Field Cancerization.Dermatology and therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32308785PMC7158909W3027644507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.