Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308714›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2020

The Efficacy and Safety of Mesalamine and Probiotics in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Chunying Tian, Yang Huang, Xiaoxia Wu, Chuhan Xu, Huaien Bu, Hongwu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Indeterminate Colitis - Update on Treatment Options.Journal of inflammation research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunying TianTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.
Yang HuangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.
Xiaoxia WuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.
Chuhan XuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.
Huaien BuTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6616-2959
Hongwu WangTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0449-715X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of mesalamine in conjunction with probiotics for ulcerative colitis.

methodsRandom controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and VIP (VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals) from inception to October 2019. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The quality of evidence was rated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Data analysis was carried out in Review Manager 5.3.

resultsA total of fifteen studies met the criteria for inclusion. Thirteen studies reported the clinical efficacy, three studies provided data on the clinical symptom scores, two trials reported disease activity index, four studies evaluated endoscopic score, and twelve studies reported adverse events. For ulcerative colitis (UC), mesalamine and probiotics had better clinical efficacy than mesalamine alone (≤8 weeks: RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.18,

conclusionOur meta-analysis results supported that mesalamine and probiotics were effective and safe in treating ulcerative colitis.

Identifiers

PMID32308714
PMCPMC7142348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.