Exploration of the Yield Potential of Mesoamerican Wild Common Beans From Contrasting Eco-Geographic Regions by Nested Recombinant Inbred Populations.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2023
   Review
2. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Phenotyping the Physiological Drought Response of Common and Tepary Bean.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
   Article
3. Application of crop wild relatives in modern breeding: An overview of resources, experimental and computational methodologies.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
   Review
4. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Genomic Regions for Important Morpho-Agronomic Traits in Mesoamerican Common Bean.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
   Article
5. Introgression Breeding in Cowpea [Frontiers in plant science · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as