Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308510›Full record

ArticleOpen access journal of contraception2020

Utilization of Family Planning Methods and Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women with Disability in Arba Minch Town, Southern Ethiopia.

Yibeltal Mesfin Yesgat, Feleke Gebremeskel, Wubshet Estifanous, Yordanos Gizachew, Seid Jemal, Natnael Atnafu, Keyredin Nuriye

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Open access journal of contraception, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yibeltal Mesfin YesgatDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Feleke GebremeskelDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Arba Minch University, Arba Minch, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-0475-0987
Wubshet EstifanousDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, ArbaMinch University, ArbaMinch, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-8376-146X
Yordanos GizachewDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, ArbaMinch University, ArbaMinch, Ethiopia.
Seid JemalDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Natnael AtnafuDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolyita Sodo, Ethiopia.
Keyredin NuriyeDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-6031-5758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGlobally in 2019, there were 1.9 billion reproductive-age women. Around 922 million of them were using either modern or traditional methods of family planning. Women with disabilities comprise 10% of worldwide women and three-quarters of them reside in low- and middle-income countries.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was designed to assess the magnitude and associated factors for family planning methods use among reproductive-age women with disabilities in Arba Minch town, southern Ethiopia. PATIENTS AND

methodsA community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 418 reproductive-age women with disabilities. Data were collected with eight women who had completed grade 12 and two of them were proficient in sign language. The data were entered into Epi-info™ version-7 software and exported into SPSS version 20 for analysis. A statistically significant variable in the final model was declared by adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and p-value <0.05.

resultsThe magnitude of family planning utilization among reproductive-age women with disabilities was 33.7%. Factors significantly associated with family planning use were being employed (AOR: 2.2, CI: 1.77-4.15), having positive attitudes (AOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.21-3.87) and marital status (AOR: 3.9, 95% CI: 2.31-6.63).

conclusionThe magnitude of family planning use among reproductive women with disabilities was low. Attitude, marital status, and being employed were significantly associated factors with family planning use. Therefore, the governmental and non-governmental organizations should work to change their attitude and creating job opportunities.

Indexed as

disabilityfamily planning utilizationreproductive age

Identifiers

PMID32308510
PMCPMC7152731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.