ArticleInfection and drug resistance2020
Characterization of
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- In vivo antibacterial activity of Streptomyces tuirus against MRSA-infected model.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular and genetic analysis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Antibiotic potentiating effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Staph wars: the antibiotic pipeline strikes back.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial resistance and molecular typing ofPeerJ · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2021Article
- Antibacterial activity and synergy of antibiotics with sanguisorbigenin isolated from Sanguisorba officinalis L. against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Letters in applied microbiology · 2021Article
- Study of biofilm formation, structure and antibiotic resistance inNew microbes and new infections · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethicillin-resistant
methodsA total of 50 MRSA isolates were determined by using the phenotypic method and
resultsIn the present study, the highest sensitivity of MRSA was to vancomycin and linezolid and the lowest to clindamycin. In the MRSA isolates, 22% were XDR and 78% were MDR.
conclusionThis study emphasizes the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.