Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308402›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2020

Hypophosphatemia Associated with Intravenous Iron Therapies for Iron Deficiency Anemia: A Systematic Literature Review.

John A Glaspy, Michelle Z Lim-Watson, Michael A Libre, Swagata S Karkare, Nandini Hadker, Aleksandra Bajic-Lucas, William E Strauss, Naomi V Dahl

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Osteomalacia as a Complication of Intravenous Iron Infusion: A Systematic Review of Case Reports.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Intravenous iron reactions: Insights from an allergy and immunology perspective.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John A GlaspyUCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michelle Z Lim-WatsonAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7123-2931
Michael A LibreTrinity LifeSciences, Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-194X
Swagata S KarkareTrinity LifeSciences, Waltham, MA, USA.
Nandini HadkerTrinity LifeSciences, Waltham, MA, USA.
Aleksandra Bajic-LucasAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8321-2444
William E StraussAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
Naomi V DahlAMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2904-3664
AMAG Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USTrinity Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron deficiency anemia (IDA) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed condition with a significant impact on quality of life. Oral iron supplementation is often poorly tolerated or yields inadequate response, requiring the use of intravenous iron (IVI) in some patients. Administration of certain IVI preparations has been associated with decreases in serum phosphate levels and clinically significant hypophosphatemia, which has been reported to lead to adverse events including serious fatigue and osteomalacia.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to systematically assess the prevalence, clinical consequences, and reporting of treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia within literature investigating IVI therapies marketed in the United States (US).

methodsA systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted using the PubMed database to identify publications reporting serum phosphate levels or rates of hypophosphatemia within adult IDA patient populations receiving current US-marketed IVIs.

resultsThe SLR yielded 511 unique publications, with 40 records meeting the final inclusion criteria. Most studies did not report phosphate monitoring methodology or an explicit definition of hypophosphatemia. Hypophosphatemia rates ranged from 0.0% to 92.1% for ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), 0.0% to 40.0% for iron sucrose, 0.4% for ferumoxytol, and 0.0% for low-molecular-weight (LMW) iron dextran. Randomized controlled studies described hypophosphatemia as "asymptomatic" or did not report on other associated sequelae. Eleven case reports detailed treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia in patients treated with FCM. Patients with acute hypophosphatemia primarily developed severe fatigue; those with repeated FCM dosing developed chronic hypophosphatemia associated with osteomalacia and bone deformities.

conclusionStudies analyzed in this SLR reported a range of hypophosphatemia rates, with the highest consistently seen in patients treated with FCM. Across the clinical literature, there appeared to be minimal standardization of phosphate monitoring and definitions of hypophosphatemia. Although multiple cases have documented serious clinical consequences of hypophosphatemia associated with certain IVIs, current trials neither consistently nor adequately assess the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia and may underestimate its prevalence.

Indexed as

hypophosphatemiaIDAiron supplementationphosphate

Identifiers

PMID32308402
PMCPMC7152545
OpenAlexW3015625765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.