Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308373›Full record

ReviewPatient preference and adherence2020

Reasons for Nonadherence to Statins - A Systematic Review of Reviews.

Marianne Vie Ingersgaard, Tue Helms Andersen, Ole Norgaard, Dan Grabowski, Kasper Olesen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Medication adherence to lipid-lowering agents after percutaneous coronary intervention: nationwide real-world data in the Netherlands.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in Non-statin Lipid Therapies: A Narrative Review of Evolving Strategies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne Vie IngersgaardHealth Promotion, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7037-2104
Tue Helms AndersenEducation Department, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-674X
Ole NorgaardEducation Department, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1681-4338
Dan GrabowskiHealth Promotion, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4323-2974
Kasper OlesenHealth Promotion, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3638-4005
Steno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLipid-lowering medications are often prescribed to decrease the risk of micro- and macro-cardiovascular complications related to dyslipidaemia. Despite widespread prescription of lipid-lowering drugs, including statins, adherence to therapy is a challenge worldwide. This systematic review of reviews aimed to conduct a critical appraisal and synthesis of review findings and to provide an overview of the factors that were found to affect adherence to lipid-lowering drugs, focusing on statins, in the reviews. PATIENTS AND

methodsA systematic review methodology was used. MEDLINE, Embase, and Epistemonikos databases were searched for relevant publications. AMSTAR 2 criteria were used to assess the quality of the selected publications.

resultsFrom a total of 763 screened publications, 9 met all inclusion criteria and were included in this synthesis. Several factors were identified as being associated with adherence to lipid-lowering agents. Among them, high socio-economic and educational position, and middle age had a positive effect on adherence to lipid-lowering agents. Contrary, female sex, older and younger age, non-white race, low socio-economic position, high co-payments, being a new statin user, comorbidities, side effects, regimen complexity, type and intensity of statin dose, smoking, alcohol consumption, imperceptible benefits, and medical distrust contributed to non-adherence. The overall quality of the included reviews was considered critically low to moderate.

conclusionThis review of reviews has evaluated the impact of factors on adherence statins. Further research related to modifiable predictors for non-adherence is warranted.

Indexed as

adherencedyslipidaemialipid-lowering drugsnonadherencereviewstatins

Identifiers

PMID32308373
PMCPMC7135196
OpenAlexW3014865116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.