Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308268›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2020

Distinctive features gleaned from the comparative genomes analysis of clinical and non-clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Jina Rajkumari, Supriyo Chakraborty, Piyush Pandey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jina RajkumariDepartment of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar 788011, Assam, India.
Supriyo ChakrabortyDepartment of Biotechnology, Assam University, Silchar 788011, Assam, India.
Piyush PandeyDepartment of Microbiology, Assam University, Silchar 788011, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is of interest to describe the distinctive features gleaned from the comparative genome analysis of clinical and non-clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The core genome of K. pneumoinae consisted of 3568 genes. Comparative genome analysis shows that mdtABCD, toxin-antitoxin systems are unique to clinical isolates and catB, benA, and transporter genes for citrate utilization are exclusive to non-clinical isolates. We further noted aromatic compound degrading genes in non-clinical isolates unlike in the later isolates. We grouped 88 core genes into 3 groups linked to infections, drug-resistance or xenobiotic metabolism using codon usage variation analysis. It is inferred using the neutrality plot analysis of GC12 with GC3 that codon usage variation is dominant over mutation pressure. Thus, we document data to distinguish clinical and non-clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae using comparative genomes analysis for understanding of genome diversity during speciation.

Indexed as

Codon usage biasComparative genomicsKlebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID32308268
PMCPMC7147497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.