Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308250›Full record

ArticleBiocybernetics and biomedical engineering

Evaluation of electrohysterogram measured from different gestational weeks for recognizing preterm delivery: a preliminary study using random Forest.

Jin Peng, Dongmei Hao, Lin Yang, Mengqing Du, Xiaoxiao Song, Hongqing Jiang, Yunhan Zhang, Dingchang Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin PengCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Dongmei HaoCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Lin YangCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Mengqing DuCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Xiaoxiao SongCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Hongqing JiangBeijing Haidian Maternal and Children Health Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yunhan ZhangCollege of Life Science and Bioengineering, Beijing University of Technology, Intelligent Physiological Measurement and Clinical Translation, Beijing International Platform for Scientific and Technological Cooperation, Beijing, China.
Dingchang ZhengCentre for Intelligent Healthcare, Faculty of Health and Life Science, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing a computational method for recognizing preterm delivery is important for timely diagnosis and treatment of preterm delivery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate electrohysterogram (EHG) signals recorded at different gestational weeks for recognizing the preterm delivery using random forest (RF). EHG signals from 300 pregnant women were divided into two groups depending on when the signals were recorded: i) preterm and term delivery with EHG recorded before the 26

Indexed as

ACC, accuracyADASYN, adaptive synthetic sampling approachANN, artificial neural networkAR, auto-regressive modelAUC, the area under the curveCorrDim, correlation dimensionDT, decision treeEHG, electrohysterogramElectrohysterogram (EHG)Feature extractionGestational weekIUPC, intrauterine pressure catheterK-NN, K-nearestLDA, linear discriminant analysisLE, Lyapunov exponentMDF, median frequencyMNF, mean frequencyPE, preterm delivery before the 26th week of gestationPF, peak frequencyPL, preterm delivery after the 26th week of gestationPreterm deliveryQDA, quadratic discriminant analysisRandom forest (RF).RF, random forestRMS, root mean squareROC, the receiver operating characteristic curveSampEn, sample entropySD, standard deviationSE, energy values in signalSM, maximum values in signalSS, singular values in signalSVM, support vector machineSV, variance values in signalTE, term delivery before the 26th week of gestationTL, term delivery after the 26th week of gestationTOCO, tocodynamometerTPEHG, term-preterm electrohysterogramTr, time reversibilityτz, zero-crossing

Identifiers

PMID32308250
PMCPMC7153772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.