Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308158›Full record

SynthesisPathogens and global health2020

Chikungunya fever in Africa: a systematic review.

Gianluca Russo, Lorenzo Subissi, Giovanni Rezza

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathogens and global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Five Hot Topics in Tropical Medicine: 2025.Infectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gianluca RussoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8764-7389
Lorenzo SubissiDirectorate Infectious Diseases in Humans Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5147-575X
Giovanni RezzaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore Di Sanita (ISS), Rome, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the identification of chikungunya virus (CHIKV), sporadic cases and outbreaks were reported in several African countries, on the Indian subcontinent, and in south-east Asia. In the last 20 years, there is a growing number of reports of CHIKV infections from African countries, but the overall picture of its circulation at the continent level remains ill-characterized because of under-diagnosis and under-reporting. Moreover, the public health impact of the infection in Africa is generally poorly understood, especially during outbreak situations. Our work has the aim to review available data on CHIKV circulation in Africa to facilitate the understanding of underlying reasons of its increased detection in the African continent.

Indexed as

AedesChikungunya FeverChikungunya virusAfricaAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansSeroepidemiologic StudiesafricaarbovirusChikungunya virusepidemiologyserology

Identifiers

PMID32308158
PMCPMC7241529
OpenAlexW3016528342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.