Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32308121›Full record

ReviewLanguage and speech2021

Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review.

Alan Ks Nielsen, Mark Dingemanse

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Language and speech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sound-action symbolism in relation to precision manipulation and whole-hand grasp usage.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  9. Ten things you should know about sign languages.Current directions in psychological science · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural Basis Of Sound-Symbolic Pseudoword-Shape Correspondences.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. What's in a JapaneseFrontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alan Ks NielsenMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Netherlands.
Mark DingemanseCentre for Language Studies, Radboud University, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-5723
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interest in iconicity (the resemblance-based mapping between aspects of form and meaning

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentSemanticsVerbal LearningComprehensionHumansLanguageLinguisticsbootstrappingcommunicationcomprehensionIconicitylearning

Identifiers

PMID32308121
PMCPMC7961653
OpenAlexW2918142691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.