ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Epigenomic Assessment of Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Interactions With Traditional Risk Metrics.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic regulation in atherosclerosis and its therapeutic potential.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Multiomics for Risk Stratification in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Chronic Kidney Disease in the "Omics" Era: Gut and Beyond.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2026Review
- A robust computational framework for methylation age and disease-risk prediction based on pairwise learning.Nature computational science · 2026Article
- Article
- Novel approaches and applications in identifying DNA methylation markers of cardio-kidney-metabolic disease.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Systems Age: a single blood methylation test to quantify aging heterogeneity across 11 physiological systems.Nature aging · 2025Article
- Cardiometabolic disease management: influences from epigenetics.Epigenomics · 2025Review
- Improving Cardiovascular Health Through the Consideration of Social Factors in Genetics and Genomics Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2025Review
- Exploring the genetics of airflow limitation in lung function across the lifespan - a polygenic risk score study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in blood reveals epigenetic signature of incident acute coronary syndrome.Nature communications · 2024Article
- DNA methylation in cardiovascular disease and heart failure: novel prediction models?Clinical epigenetics · 2024Review
- Pruning and thresholding approach for methylation risk scores in multi-ancestry populations.Epigenetics · 2023Article
- Epigenetics of Early Cardiometabolic Disease: Mechanisms and Precision Medicine.Circulation research · 2023Review
- DNA methylation-based biomarkers for cardiometabolic-related traits and their importance for risk stratification.Current opinion in epidemiology and public health · 2023Article
- Appraisal of Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Biomarkers, and Ocular Imaging in Cardiovascular Risk Prediction.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Article
- A blood DNA methylation biomarker for predicting short-term risk of cardiovascular events.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
- Association of Cardiovascular Health Through Young Adulthood With Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns in Midlife: The CARDIA Study.Circulation · 2022Article
- DNA methylation-based predictors of health: applications and statistical considerations.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background Epigenome-wide association studies for cardiometabolic risk factors have discovered multiple loci associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, few studies have sought to directly optimize a predictor of CVD risk. Furthermore, it is challenging to train multivariate models across multiple studies in the presence of study- or batch effects. Methods and Results Here, we analyzed existing DNA methylation data collected using the Illumina HumanMethylation450 microarray to create a predictor of CVD risk across 3 cohorts: Women's Health Initiative, Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort, and Lothian Birth Cohorts. We trained Cox proportional hazards-based elastic net regressions for incident CVD separately in each cohort and used a recently introduced cross-study learning approach to integrate these individual scores into an ensemble predictor. The methylation-based risk score was associated with CVD time-to-event in a held-out fraction of the Framingham data set (hazard ratio per SD=1.28, 95% CI, 1.10-1.50) and predicted myocardial infarction status in the independent REGICOR (Girona Heart Registry) data set (odds ratio per SD=2.14, 95% CI, 1.58-2.89). These associations remained after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors and were similar to those from elastic net models trained on a directly merged data set. Additionally, we investigated interactions between the methylation-based risk score and both genetic and biochemical CVD risk, showing preliminary evidence of an enhanced performance in those with less traditional risk factor elevation. Conclusions This investigation provides proof-of-concept for a genome-wide, CVD-specific epigenomic risk score and suggests that DNA methylation data may enable the discovery of high-risk individuals who would be missed by alternative risk metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.