ReviewClinical drug investigation2020
Tumor-Agnostic Treatment for Cancer: When How is Better than Where.
Review in Clinical drug investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict pathological response and guide therapy personalization in the neoadjuvant setting.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Review
- Basket Trials: Past, Present, and Future.Annual review of cancer biology · 2024Article
- Article
- The Safety Profiles of Two First-Generation NTRK Inhibitors: Analysis of Individual Case Safety Reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Supporting Biomarker-Driven Therapies in Oncology: A Genomic Testing Cost Calculator.The oncologist · 2023Article
- Cancer in pregnancy: treatment effects.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Perioperative Tailored Treatments for Gastric Cancer: Times Are Changing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Treatment Strategy for Oligometastatic Gastric Cancer: Brief Considerations.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Article
- Fortification of Iron Oxide as Sustainable Nanoparticles: An Amalgamation with Magnetic/Photo Responsive Cancer Therapies.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Review
- Molecular matched targeted therapies for primary brain tumors-a single center retrospective analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: No longer young, but not yet old.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibition as Single Therapy for Synchronous Cancers Exhibiting Hypermutation: An IRRDC Study.JCO precision oncology · 2022Article
- Identifying the Steps Required to Effectively Implement Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology at a National Level in Europe.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Samples for Next Generation Sequencing: Problems and Solutions.Genes · 2021Review
- Toward improved models of human cancer.APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Beyond Conventional: The New Horizon of Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the evolving landscape of precision oncology, genomic characterization of tumor has become crucial in order to move toward a molecular-based therapy for the vast majority of cancers. Recently, translational research has offered new perspectives in systemic cancer treatment thanks to the identification of novel oncogenic targets and the development of new targeted therapies, followed by the latest applications of genomic sequencing. Simultaneously, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has expanded its accessibility, being incorporated into clinical studies at the time of the initial screening, disease progression, and often in longitudinal monitoring of molecular changes. Consequently, new potentially targetable molecular alterations have been identified in several different types of tumors, leading to the development of tumor-agnostic treatments. Being highly selective for specific molecular alterations, these drugs are active against different subtypes of oncogene-addicted cancers. Three of these drugs-pembrolizumab [an anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (MAb)], larotrectinib [a pan-tropomyosin receptor tyrosine kinase (TRK) inhibitor], and entrectinib [a pan-TRK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS-1 inhibitor]-received US FDA approval in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. In this article, we critically review the clinical studies responsible for FDA approval and the most recently updated results. We then discuss the benefits and limitations of these new methodological approaches, paying particular attention to the largest precision medicine master protocol, NCI-MATCH. Among the benefits, there are the increased chances of offering targeted therapies for patients with specific alterations identified in different types of tumors. Among the limitations, we highlight that the same driver mutation may require different therapeutic strategies in different types of cancers. Additionally, the complex study design undeniably requires a dynamic strategy to enroll patients with considerable economic and managerial efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32307639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.