Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32307517›Full record

ArticleJournal of travel medicine2020

Antigen-based diagnosis of Schistosoma infection in travellers: a prospective study.

Miriam Casacuberta-Partal, Jacqueline J Janse, Roos van Schuijlenburg, Jutte J C de Vries, Marianne A A Erkens, Kitty Suijk, Mariëlle van Aalst, Jaap J Maas, Martin P Grobusch, Perry J J van Genderen and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of travel medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02194712 (Detection of Schistosomiasis Circulating Anodic Antigen), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02194712 completednot on this map

Detection of Schistosomiasis Circulating Anodic Antigen (CAA) in Travellers After High-risk Water Contact

TypeobservationalSponsorMeta RoestenbergRan2015 to 2019Enrolled106ConditionsSchistosomiasisArmsUrine CAA detection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam Casacuberta-PartalDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline J JanseDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Roos van SchuijlenburgDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jutte J C de VriesDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marianne A A ErkensDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Kitty SuijkDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mariëlle van AalstCentre of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jaap J MaasOccupational Health and Safety Service, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin P GrobuschCentre of Tropical Medicine and Travel Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, AMC, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Perry J J van GenderenInstitute for Tropical Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudia de DoodDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Paul L A M CorstjensDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Govert J van DamDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lisette van LieshoutDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Meta RoestenbergDepartment of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Centre, L4-Q, PO Box 9600, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTravellers infected with Schistosoma spp. might be pauci- or even asymptomatic on first presentation. Therefore, schistosomiasis may remain undiagnosed in this population. Active infection, as evidenced by the presence of the tissue-dwelling worm, can be demonstrated via the detection of adult worm-derived circulating anodic antigen (CAA) utilising a robust well-described lateral flow-(LF) based test applying background-free up-converting reporter particles (UCP). In this prospective study, we assessed the diagnostic value of serum and urine UCP-LF CAA test in comparison with two Schistosoma-specific serological assays detecting antibodies against adult worm antigen-immuno fluorescence assay (AWA-IFA) and against soluble egg antigen-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SEA-ELISA) antigens in travellers.

methodsSamples were collected from 106 Dutch travellers who reported freshwater contact in sub-Saharan Africa and who were recruited up to 2 years after return. Subjects were asked to complete a detailed questionnaire on travel history, water contact, signs and symptoms compatible with schistosomiasis.

resultsTwo travellers were positive by serum CAA and an additional one by urine CAA. A total of 22/106 (21%) samples were antibody positive by AWA-IFA and 9/106 (9%) by SEA-ELISA. At follow-up 6 weeks and 6 months after praziquantel treatment, all seropositives remained antibody positive whereas CAA was cleared. Seropositivity could not be predicted by the type of fresh water-related activity, country visited or symptoms reported.

conclusionThe low number of UCP-LF CAA positives suggests that in travellers, active infections often do not establish or have very low worm burden. Based on our high seroconversion rates, we conclude that the AWA-IFA assay is the most sensitive test to detect schistosome exposure. Given the lack of predictive symptoms or risk factors, we recommend schistosomiasis screening at least by serology in all travellers with reported freshwater contact in high-endemic areas.

Indexed as

Antibodies, HelminthAntigens, HelminthSchistosomiasis mansoniTravel-Related IllnessAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesSchistosomaSchistosoma mansoniSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsAntibodies, HelminthAntigens, Helminthcirculating anodic antigen (CAA)freshwater contactpraziquantelquestionnaireSchistosomiasisserology

Identifiers

PMID32307517
PMCPMC7359925
OpenAlexW3017112868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.