Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32307515›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2020

A multicentre, pragmatic, cluster randomised, controlled feasibility trial of the POD system of care.

John Young, John Green, Amanda Farrin, Michelle Collinson, Suzanne Hartley, Jane Smith, Elizabeth Teale, Najma Siddiqi, Sharon K Inouye

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Nonpharmaceutical concepts for prevention and treatment of delirium].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

John YoungAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
John GreenAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Amanda FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michelle CollinsonClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Suzanne HartleyClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jane SmithAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Elizabeth TealeAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
Najma SiddiqiHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Sharon K InouyeBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
University of Leeds · GBBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHull York Medical School · GB

Funding

Supplement to Network for Investigation of Delirium across the U.S (NIDUS)R24AG054259 · NIA · HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER FOR AGED · PI INOUYE, SHARON K. · 2016 to 2020
$4.3M
Department of Health PB-PG-0610-22068Department of Health RP-PG-0108-10037NIA NIH HHS R24 AG054259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto provide a preliminary estimate of the effectiveness of the prevention of delirium (POD) system of care in reducing incident delirium in acute hospital wards and gather data for a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

designcluster randomised and controlled feasibility trial.

settingsixteen acute care of older people and orthopaedic trauma wards in eight hospitals in England and Wales.

participantspatients 65 years and over admitted to participating wards during the trial period.

interventionsparticipating wards were randomly assigned to either the POD programme or usual care, determined by existing local policies and practices. The POD programme is a manualised multicomponent delirium prevention intervention that targets 10 risk factors for delirium. The intervention wards underwent a 6-month implementation period before trial recruitment commenced. Main outcome measure incidence of new-onset delirium measured using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) measured daily for up to 10 days post consent.

resultsout of 4449, 3274 patients admitted to the wards were eligible. In total, 714 patients consented (713 registered) to the trial, thirty-three participants (4.6%) withdrew. Adherence to the intervention was classified as at least medium for seven wards. Rates of new-onset delirium were lower than expected and did not differ between groups (24 (7.0%) of participants in the intervention group versus 33 (8.9%) in the control group; odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.68 (0.37-1.26); P = 0.2225).

conclusionsbased on these findings, a definitive trial is achievable and would need to recruit 5220 patients in 26 two-ward hospital clusters. Trial registration: ISRCTN01187372. Registered 13 March 2014.

Indexed as

ConfusionHospitalizationAgedEnglandFeasibility StudiesHumansWalesdeliriumhospitalsmulticomponent interventionsolder peopleprevention

Identifiers

PMID32307515
PMCPMC7331094
OpenAlexW3017031947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.