ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2020
Provider perspectives on shared decision-making regarding hypospadias surgery.
Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multi-site cultural and linguistic adaptation of a hypospadias decision aid for Latinx communities.Journal of pediatric urology · 2024Article
- Call the experts: identifying stakeholders in the long-term care of youth with hypospadias.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Differences of sex development and surgical decisions: focus group interviews with health care professionals in Norway.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2024Article
- Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Role of epigenetics in the etiology of hypospadias through penile foreskin DNA methylation alterations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A qualitative content analysis of the experience of hypospadias care: The importance of owning your own narrative.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Shared decision-making for pediatric elective penile surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Ask the parents: Testing the acceptability and usability of a hypospadias decision aid.Journal of pediatric urology · 2022Article
- User testing of a hypospadias decision aid prototype at a pediatric medical conference.Journal of pediatric urology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMany parents experience decisional conflict and decisional regret around hypospadias surgery. The utilization of a shared decision-making (SDM) process may mitigate these issues, however addressing the principal components of the SDM process is a complex task that requires the investment of providers.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to facilitate a discussion about SDM anchored on hypospadias with pediatric urology and general pediatric providers to explore perspectives, clinical applications and barriers to adopting SDM in clinical practice. STUDY
designWe conducted two focus groups in order to engage pediatric urology and general pediatric providers in guided discussions about SDM anchored on hypospadias. All activities were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. The transcripts were analyzed by three coders using directed qualitative content analysis techniques to identify themes and relationships between themes to inform the development of an affinity diagram (Extended Summary Figure).
resultsTwo focus groups were held; one with seven pediatric urology providers in November 2018 and one with ten general pediatric providers in January 2019 (median age 51 years, 88.2% Caucasian, 58.8% female, 70.6% physicians and 29.4% nurse practitioners). Both groups identified some of the key components of SDM including engaging families in decision-making, informing them about treatment options and clarifying values/preferences (Extended Summary Figure). They thought that SDM was useful for discussing preference-sensitive conditions (e.g. hypospadias) and addressing parental compliance. General pediatric providers also suggested that SDM helped them avoid unnecessary referrals to specialists. Both groups identified parental, provider and systemic barriers to the adoption of SDM: a) desire for paternalism, b) misperceptions about medical evidence, c) completion of parental decision-making prior to the clinical visit, d) provider bias/lack of interest and e) time constraints/productivity pressures. DISCUSSION: Providers who care for hypospadias patients are knowledgeable about SDM and its potential clinical applications. They identified several potentially modifiable barriers to the adoption of a SDM process about hypospadias surgery in a pediatric clinical setting.
conclusionsBased on feedback from providers, we plan to implement a hypospadias decision aid early in the parental decision-making process about hypospadias such as in the postpartum unit and at well-child visits in the newborn period and provide a provider training session about SDM to address the identified knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.