Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32307325›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2020

Provider perspectives on shared decision-making regarding hypospadias surgery.

Katherine H Chan, Rosalia Misseri, Mark P Cain, Benjamin Whittam, Konrad Szymanski, Martin Kaefer, Richard Rink, Brandon Cockrum, Courtney Moore, Sarah Wiehe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets.International journal of impotence research · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Shared decision-making for pediatric elective penile surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine H ChanDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Comparative Effectiveness Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: kchubert@iupui.edu.
Rosalia MisseriDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: rmisseri@iupui.edu.
Mark P CainDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: mark.cain@seattlechildrens.org.
Benjamin WhittamDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: bwhittam@iupui.edu.
Konrad SzymanskiDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: Szymanski.konrad@gmail.com.
Martin KaeferDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: mkaefer@iupui.edu.
Richard RinkDepartment of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: rrink@iupui.edu.
Brandon CockrumResearch Jam, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: bcockrum@iu.edu.
Courtney MooreResearch Jam, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: crtnymre@iu.edu.
Sarah WieheResearch Jam, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: swiehe@iu.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Management: Improving Submissions and Study Conduct in the Human Subjects Research Prior Approval ProcessUL1TR002529 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MOE, SHARON M, WIEHE, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$27.2M
Engaging families to improve the care of patients with hypospadias - Hypospadias COVID Extension.K23DK111987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHAN, KATHERINE HUBERT · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002529NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK111987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany parents experience decisional conflict and decisional regret around hypospadias surgery. The utilization of a shared decision-making (SDM) process may mitigate these issues, however addressing the principal components of the SDM process is a complex task that requires the investment of providers.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to facilitate a discussion about SDM anchored on hypospadias with pediatric urology and general pediatric providers to explore perspectives, clinical applications and barriers to adopting SDM in clinical practice. STUDY

designWe conducted two focus groups in order to engage pediatric urology and general pediatric providers in guided discussions about SDM anchored on hypospadias. All activities were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. The transcripts were analyzed by three coders using directed qualitative content analysis techniques to identify themes and relationships between themes to inform the development of an affinity diagram (Extended Summary Figure).

resultsTwo focus groups were held; one with seven pediatric urology providers in November 2018 and one with ten general pediatric providers in January 2019 (median age 51 years, 88.2% Caucasian, 58.8% female, 70.6% physicians and 29.4% nurse practitioners). Both groups identified some of the key components of SDM including engaging families in decision-making, informing them about treatment options and clarifying values/preferences (Extended Summary Figure). They thought that SDM was useful for discussing preference-sensitive conditions (e.g. hypospadias) and addressing parental compliance. General pediatric providers also suggested that SDM helped them avoid unnecessary referrals to specialists. Both groups identified parental, provider and systemic barriers to the adoption of SDM: a) desire for paternalism, b) misperceptions about medical evidence, c) completion of parental decision-making prior to the clinical visit, d) provider bias/lack of interest and e) time constraints/productivity pressures. DISCUSSION: Providers who care for hypospadias patients are knowledgeable about SDM and its potential clinical applications. They identified several potentially modifiable barriers to the adoption of a SDM process about hypospadias surgery in a pediatric clinical setting.

conclusionsBased on feedback from providers, we plan to implement a hypospadias decision aid early in the parental decision-making process about hypospadias such as in the postpartum unit and at well-child visits in the newborn period and provide a provider training session about SDM to address the identified knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedHypospadiasChildDecision MakingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedParentsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID32307325
PMCPMC8562057
OpenAlexW3013773889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.