Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306938›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

The NHS visitor and migrant cost recovery programme - a threat to health?

J L Potter, M Burman, C D Tweed, D Vaghela, H Kunst, D Swinglehurst, C J Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Love in the time of Corona.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J L PotterCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England. Jessica.potter@qmul.ac.uk.
M BurmanCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
C D TweedMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, England.
D VaghelaCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
H KunstCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
D SwinglehurstCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.
C J GriffithsCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, England.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0317-20039Medical Research Council MR/M014517/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn April 2014 the UK government launched the 'NHS Visitor and Migrant Cost Recovery Programme Implementation Plan' which set out a series of policy changes to recoup costs from 'chargeable' (largely non-UK born) patients. In England, approximately 75% of tuberculosis (TB) cases occur in people born abroad. Delays in TB treatment increase risk of morbidity, mortality and transmission in the community. We investigated whether diagnostic delay has increased since the Cost Recovery Programme (CRP) was introduced.

methodsThere were 3342 adult TB cases notified on the London TB Register across Barts Health NHS Trust between 1st January 2011 and 31st December 2016. Cases with missing relevant information were excluded. The median time between symptom onset and treatment initiation before and after the CRP was calculated according to birthplace and compared using the Mann Whitney test. Delayed diagnosis was considered greater or equal to median time to treatment for all patients (79 days). Univariable logistic regression was used to manually select exposure variables for inclusion in a multivariable model to test the association between diagnostic delay and the implementation of the CRP.

resultsWe included 2237 TB cases. Among non-UK born patients, median time-to-treatment increased from 69 days to 89 days following introduction of CRP (p < 0.001). Median time-to-treatment also increased for the UK-born population from 75.5 days to 89.5 days (p = 0.307). The multivariable logistic regression model showed non-UK born patients were more likely to have a delay in diagnosis after the CRP (adjOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66, p value 0.001).

conclusionSince the introduction of the CRP there has been a significant delay for TB treatment among non-UK born patients. Further research exploring the effect of policies restricting access to healthcare for migrants is urgently needed if we wish to eliminate TB nationally.

Indexed as

Transients and MigrantsAdultDelayed DiagnosisEnglandFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRegistriesState MedicineTime-to-TreatmentTuberculosis, PulmonaryYoung AdultHealthcare accessMigrant healthPolicytuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32306938
PMCPMC7169002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.