Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306934›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2020

Perforation of anastomotic peptic ulcer following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of three cases.

Ikuma Shioi, Naoyuki Yokoyama, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Makoto Aoki, Daisuke Sato, Tetsuya Otani

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ikuma ShioiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan. kumaface2004@gmail.com.
Naoyuki YokoyamaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Motoharu HiraiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Masaru KomatsuDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Akira KubotaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Makoto AokiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Daisuke SatoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Tetsuya OtaniDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Niigata City General Hospital, 463-7 Shumoku, Chou-ku, Niigata City, 950-1197, Japan.
Niigata City General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerforation of a marginal peptic ulcer after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) can lead to severe conditions, although its clinical features have not been well reported. In this article, we present three cases of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD that we experienced in our institute and attempt to clarify its appropriate treatment and prevention. CASE PRESENTATION: Marginal ulcer perforation confirmed with computed tomography and/or surgical exploration occurred in 3 (1.8%) of 163 consecutive patients who underwent PD (including 160 patients who underwent a total or subtotal stomach-preserving procedure) at our institution. The three patients (one man and two women) had a median age of 77 (65-79) years. Two of these patients had a medical history of duodenal peptic ulcer. All three patients had biliary neoplasms. Two of the patients underwent subtotal stomach-preserving PD with antro-jejunal anastomosis, and the other patient underwent pylorus-preserving PD with duodenal jejunostomy. The perforation occurred with a sudden and severe onset of abdominal pain 34, 94, and 1204 days, respectively, after the PDs. At the time of the perforation, all of the patients had been withdrawn from postoperative prophylactic antipeptic ulcer agents, with the cessation periods ranging from 12 to 1008 days. In addition, all the patients were in fasting conditions for 1 to 13 days just before the perforation. Surgical treatment with direct suturing of the perforated ulcer was performed for two patients, while conservative therapy was performed for one patient. Their primary treatment courses were satisfactory. Chronic antisecretory agent therapy was prescribed for 562, 271, and 2370 days, respectively, from marginal ulcer perforation, and no ulcer recurrence was noted in any of the patients.

conclusionsLack of antisecretory therapy and fasting were considered an essential cause of marginal peptic ulcer perforation after PD. In addition, unlike the native duodenum, the jejunal limb used for reconstruction to a preserved stomach may be at increased risk of ulceration. Chronic permanent administration of antisecretory agents and fasting avoidance are desirable for patients who have undergone stomach-preserving PD to prevent marginal ulcer perforation.

Indexed as

AgedAnastomosis, SurgicalDuodenal UlcerFemaleHumansMalePancreaticoduodenectomyPeptic UlcerPeptic Ulcer PerforationPostoperative PeriodGastric acidGastroduodenal ulcerIntestinal perforationPancreatic juicePancreaticoduodenectomyPeptic ulcerPostoperative complicationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID32306934
PMCPMC7168954
OpenAlexW3017012852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.