Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306875›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Are humans constantly but subconsciously smelling themselves?

Ofer Perl, Eva Mishor, Aharon Ravia, Inbal Ravreby, Noam Sobel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Mind From Within: Visceral Roots of Human Cognition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Limitations in odour simulation may originate from differential sensory embodiment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Interdisciplinary challenges for elucidating human olfactory attractiveness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ofer PerlDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Eva MishorDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Aharon RaviaDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Inbal RavrebyDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Noam SobelDepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Weizmann Institute of Science · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All primates, including humans, engage in self-face-touching at very high frequency. The functional purpose or antecedents of this behaviour remain unclear. In this

Indexed as

OdorantsSmellTouchAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultbody-odourface-touchingself-samplingself-sniffingsocial chemosignalling

Identifiers

PMID32306875
PMCPMC7209943
OpenAlexW3016496082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.