Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306871›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Body odours as a chemosignal in the mother-child relationship: new insights based on an human leucocyte antigen-genotyped family cohort.

Laura Schäfer, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Jürgen Sauter, Alexander H Schmidt, Ilona Croy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06058208 (The Effect of Baby Smell and Visual Stimulus Program on Mothers' Cortical and Breast Oxygenation, Milk Amount and Mother-Infant Attachment), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06058208 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Baby Smell and Visual Stimulus Program on Mothers' Cortical and Breast Oxygenation, Milk Amount and Mother-Infant Attachment: Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSelcuk UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled54ConditionsCesarean Delivery Affecting Fetus, Preterm LaborArmsOlfactory stimulation, Visual stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-verbal effecting - animal research sheds light on human emotion communication.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Past, Present, and Future of Human Chemical Communication Research.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  6. The scent of cuteness-neural signatures of infant body odors.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Interdisciplinary challenges for elucidating human olfactory attractiveness.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura SchäferDepartment of Psychosomatics, Technische Universität, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Agnieszka SorokowskaDepartment of Psychosomatics, Technische Universität, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen SauterDKMS, Kressbach 1, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.
Alexander H SchmidtDKMS, Kressbach 1, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.
Ilona CroyDepartment of Psychosomatics, Technische Universität, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Deutsche Knochenmarkspenderdatei · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Wrocław · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mothers are able to identify the body odour (BO) of their own child and prefer this smell above other BOs. It has hence been assumed that the infantile BO functions as a chemosignal promoting targeted parental care. We tested this hypothesis and examined whether children's BOs signal genetic similarity and developmental status to mothers. In addition, we assessed whether BOs facilitate inbreeding avoidance (Westermarck effect). In a cross-sectional design,

Indexed as

Mother-Child RelationsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMothersNonverbal CommunicationOdorantsOlfactory Perceptionbody odourchemosensory communicationhormonesmajor histocompatibility complexolfactionparent–child relationship

Identifiers

PMID32306871
PMCPMC7209942
OpenAlexW3017016464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.