Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306809›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Prognostic Implications of Resistive Reserve Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.

Seung Hun Lee, Joo Myung Lee, Jonghanne Park, Ki Hong Choi, Doyeon Hwang, Joon-Hyung Doh, Chang-Wook Nam, Eun-Seok Shin, Masahiro Hoshino, Tadashi Murai and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Angiography-based coronary microvascular assessment with and without intracoronary pressure measurements: a systematic review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Seung Hun LeeDivision of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Heart Vascular Stroke Institute Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea.
Joo Myung LeeDivision of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Heart Vascular Stroke Institute Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea.
Jonghanne ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea.
Ki Hong ChoiDivision of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Heart Vascular Stroke Institute Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Seoul Korea.
Doyeon HwangDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea.
Joon-Hyung DohDepartment of Medicine Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital Goyang South Korea.
Chang-Wook NamDepartment of Medicine Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center Daegu South Korea.
Eun-Seok ShinDivision of Cardiology Ulsan Hospital Ulsan Korea.
Masahiro HoshinoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Ibaraki Japan.
Tadashi MuraiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Ibaraki Japan.
Taishi YonetsuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine Tokyo Medical and Dental University Tokyo Japan.
Hernán Mejía-RenteríaCardiovascular Institute Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid Spain.
Tsunekazu KakutaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Ibaraki Japan.
Javier EscanedCardiovascular Institute Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid Spain.
International Collaboration of Comprehensive Physiologic Assessment Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Resistive reserve ratio is a thermodilution-based index which integrates both coronary flow and pressure. Resistive reserve ratio represents the vasodilatory capacity of interrogated vessels including both epicardial coronary artery and microvascular circulation. We evaluated the prognostic potential of resistive reserve ratio compared with pressure-derived index (fractional flow reserve [FFR]) or flow-derived index (coronary flow reserve [CFR]). Methods and Results A total of 1245 patients underwent coronary pressure and flow measurement using pressure-temperature wire. Resistive reserve ratio was calculated by CFR adjusted using the ratio between resting and hyperemic distal coronary pressure ([resting mean transit time/hyperemic mean transit time]×[resting distal coronary pressure/hyperemic distal coronary pressure]). Clinical outcome was assessed by patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), a composite of any death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization at 5 years. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of POCO was significantly different according to quartiles of resistive reserve ratio (9.9%, 11.3%, 17.2%, and 22.7% in quartiles 1 to 4, respectively, log rank

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary CirculationVascular ResistanceAgedBlood Flow VelocityBlood PressureCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRegistriescoronary artery diseasecoronary flow reservefractional flow reserveprognosisresistive reserve ratio

Identifiers

PMID32306809
PMCPMC7428535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.