Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306261›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Ecological risk evaluation and source apportionment of heavy metals in park playgrounds: a case study in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, a northwest city of China.

Bin Guo, Yi Su, Lin Pei, Xiaofeng Wang, Bo Zhang, Dingming Zhang, Xiaoxia Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Research on heavy metal level and co-occurrence network in typical ecological fragile area.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bin GuoCollege of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China. guobin12@xust.edu.cn.
Yi SuCollege of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Lin PeiSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaofeng WangShaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation, Xi'an, China.
Bo ZhangCollege of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Dingming ZhangCollege of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Xiaoxia WangCollege of Geomatics, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Xi'an University of Science and Technology · CNLand Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Scientific research project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education 16JK1828the Fund Project of Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation 2019-JC11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Park playgrounds recently are suffering serious heavy metals contamination in China. It is urgent to assess the ecological risk and identify the sources for heavy metals. A total of 111 topsoil samples were collected from four park playgrounds in Xi'an, and the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) instrument was used to measure the concentrations of heavy metals including chromium(Cr), nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), lead (Pb), manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co), respectively. Ecological risk ([Formula: see text]) and potential ecological risk index (RI) were introduced to determine the pollution level and ecological risk, and the absolute principal component score-multiple linear regression (APCS-MLR) model was implemented to identify the sources for heavy metals. The main results were as follows. (1) Except As, the mean concentrations of measured heavy metals of four park playgrounds surpassed the soil background values of Shaanxi Province. (2) In each park playground, the [Formula: see text] was below a "low" risk level ([Formula: see text]=10) for Cr, Ni, Zn, As, and Mn; Cu was between a "moderate" and "considerable" risk level; Pb was between a "low" and "moderate" risk level; and [Formula: see text] was between a "considerable" and "high" risk level for Co. Besides, the RI index was on a "high" risk level (120 < RI < 240) with an obvious spatial distinction. (3) The anthropogenic factors were the main sources for heavy metals, and mixed sources and natural sources were considered as the minor sources for metals. (4) The sources contributions for Co had obvious spatial heterogeneity in each park situated in four different urban planning districts.

Indexed as

ChinaCitiesEnvironmental MonitoringMetals, HeavyRisk AssessmentSoilSoil PollutantsMetals, HeavySoilSoil PollutantsHeavy metal contaminationSoilSourceSpatial distributionXRF

Identifiers

PMID32306261
OpenAlexW3016871314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.