Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306198›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2020

Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with modified single stoma cutaneous ureterostomy, bilateral cutaneous ureterostomy and ileal conduit.

Tsaturyan Arman, Beglaryan Mher, Shahsuvaryan Varujan, Fanarjyan Sergey, Tsaturyan Ashot

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bricker ileal conduit vs. Cutaneous ureterostomy after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparison of long-term outcomes between ileal conduit and transuretero-cutaneostomy urinary diversion after radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tsaturyan ArmanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University After Mkhitar Heratsi, Koryun 2, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia. tsaturyanarman@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-7015
Beglaryan MherFaculty of Informatics and Applied Mathematics, Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia.
Shahsuvaryan VarujanDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University After Mkhitar Heratsi, Koryun 2, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia.
Fanarjyan SergeyDepartment of Urology, Yerevan State Medical University After Mkhitar Heratsi, Koryun 2, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia.
Tsaturyan AshotDepartment of Urology, Artmed" Medical Rehabilitation Center, Tsarav Aghbyur 55a, 0052, Yerevan, Armenia.
Yerevan State Medical University · AMYahoo (United Kingdom) · GBYerevan State University · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the clinical outcomes and patients' health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) with modified single stoma cutaneous ureterostomy (MCU), bilateral standard cutaneous ureterostomy (SCU) and ileal conduit (IC) using validated diversion-specific HR-QoL instrument.

methodsThe study included 70 patients who underwent open radical cystectomy with either MCU, SCU, or IC from May 2017 to May 2018. In total 23, 25 and 22 patients were included in each group, respectively, after applying the following exclusion criteria: female, pre- and postoperative radio and chemotherapy, palliative surgery. HR-QoL was evaluated using the European Association of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for patients undergoing radical cystectomy (FACT-Bl-Cys).

resultsGlobal health status per EORTC-QLQ-C30 was the only domain that was found to be statistically better in the IC group compared to MCU (p = 0.007). Higher scores in additional concerns (p = 0.008), functional health domains (p = 0.002), satisfaction from urinary diversion (p = 0.004), and total score (p = 0.027) per FACT-Bl-Cys questionnaire, global health status (p < 0.001), and symptom scale (p = 0.017) per EORTC-QLQ-C30 were observed in IC compered to SCU. Patients with MCU had better scores of functional health (p = 0.012), satisfaction from urinary diversion (p = 0.001), and global health status (p = 0.008) than SCU.

conclusionIC is associated with better quality of life scores compared to SCU and similar scores compared to MCU. MCU possesses better scores of HR-QoL domains compared to SCU. Our results suggest that MCU should be preferred in patients requiring SCU and could be considered for patients requiring IC.

Indexed as

CystectomyDermatologic Surgical ProceduresQuality of LifeUrinary DiversionAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurgical StomasTreatment OutcomeUreterostomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCutaneous ureterostomyHealth-related quality of lifeIleal conduitRadical cystectomyUrinary diversion

Identifiers

PMID32306198
OpenAlexW3017256769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.