Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306112›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2020

Robotic extended cholecystectomy in gallbladder cancer.

Yoonhyeong Byun, Yoo Jin Choi, Jae Seung Kang, Youngmin Han, Hongbeom Kim, Wooil Kwon, Jin-Young Jang

Abstract readEvaluation StudyVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoonhyeong Byun *Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Yoo Jin Choi *Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jae Seung KangDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Youngmin HanDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hongbeom KimDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Wooil KwonDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Young JangDepartment of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. jangjy4@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe application of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) requiring extended cholecystectomy is challenging, in terms of achieving clinically safe and complete oncologic resection. Recently developed robotic systems, however, may provide advantages in overcoming difficulties faced by laparoscopic MIS. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and advantages of a robotic system to assist with extended cholecystectomy.

methodsPatients diagnosed with clinically suspected stage T2 or above, GBC (as determined by preoperative computed tomography or ultrasonography) underwent robotic extended cholecystectomy (REC) from February 2018 to January 2020. The attached video shows the detailed procedure in the following order: the positioning of the patient and the trocars, Kocher maneuver, lymph node dissection (#8, 9, 12, 13), skeletonization of hepatoduodenal ligament, ligation of the cystic duct and liver resection.

resultsOf 16 patients who underwent REC, mean operation time was 198.3 min and the median estimated blood loss was 295 ml. 11 patients (68.8%) were pathologically diagnosed as stage T2 or above, and the metastatic lymph node was identified in 3 patients (18.8%). All cases had secured tumor-free resection margins, and 3 patients (18.8%) showed invasion to the hepatic parenchyma. The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 7.2. The median duration of hospital stay was 7 days. There were no mortality or recurrence within 90 days after the operation.

conclusionThis study suggests that robotic systems can be safely utilized in advanced stage GBC, facilitating oncologically sufficient lymph node dissection and rapid recovery.

Indexed as

AgedCholecystectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHepatectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeExtended cholecystectomyGallbladder cancerRadical cholecystectomyRobotic extended cholecystectomyRobot surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.