Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306064›Full record

ReviewExperimental brain research2020

Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a non-invasive window into the excitatory circuits involved in human motor behavior.

Ricci Hannah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ricci HannahDepartment of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, San Diego, USA. rhannah@ucsd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5379-3292
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is one of the most popular non-invasive tools for investigating the cortical circuits involved in human movement. Stimulation of the primary motor cortex elicits motor evoked potentials in peripheral muscles, the amplitude of which reflects the net excitability of circuits in the cortex and spinal cord. A number of methods exist to help broadly distinguish between excitatory and inhibitory influences on corticospinal output, allowing us to probe changes in the respective cortical circuits before and during movement. Something that has rarely been considered in human TMS studies, however, is the idea that specific populations of excitatory neurons might underlie different aspects of motor behavior. The current article provides a brief review of recent TMS studies which suggest that it is possible to selectively probe distinct excitatory inputs to corticospinal neurons during a range of movement-related states, from the preparation and execution of movements, to the suppression of unwanted movements. Together with recent advancements in computational modelling of the mechanisms of TMS and the capacity to record single-cell responses to TMS in behaving non-human primates, this avenue of research has the potential to shed light on the motor circuits underlying the repertoire of human motor behaviors, as well as their pathophysiology in diseases of the motor system.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansMovementSpinal CordConnectivityCorticospinalMotor controlMotor cortexMotor learningTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32306064
OpenAlexW3017304140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.