Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32306060›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2021

Advanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Jean-Michel Correas, Ethan J Halpern, Richard G Barr, Sangeet Ghai, Jochen Walz, Sylvain Bodard, Charles Dariane, Jean de la Rosette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Toward confident prostate cancer detection using ultrasound: a multi-center study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Jean-Michel CorreasDepartment of Adult Radiology, Paris University and Necker University Hospital, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris Cedex 15, France. jean-michel.correas@aphp.fr.
Ethan J HalpernDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Richard G BarrDepartment of Radiology, Northeastern Ohio Medical University, Rootstown, OH, USA.
Sangeet GhaiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jochen WalzDepartment of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France.
Sylvain BodardDepartment of Adult Radiology, Paris University and Necker University Hospital, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015, Paris Cedex 15, France.
Charles DarianeDepartment of Urology, Paris University and European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Jean de la RosetteDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRIstanbul Medipol University · TRNortheast Ohio Medical University · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) can be challenging due to the limited performance of current diagnostic tests, including PSA, digital rectal examination and transrectal conventional US. Multiparametric MRI has improved PCa diagnosis and is recommended prior to biopsy; however, mp-MRI does miss a substantial number of PCa. Advanced US modalities include transrectal prostate elastography and contrast-enhanced US, as well as improved B-mode, micro-US and micro-Doppler techniques. These techniques can be combined to define a novel US approach, multiparametric US (mp-US). Mp-US improves PCa diagnosis but is not sufficiently accurate to obviate the utility of mp-MRI. Mp-US using advanced techniques and mp-MRI provide complementary information which will become even more important in the era of focal therapy, where precise identification of PCa location is needed.

Indexed as

AdultAgedContrast MediaElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonographyContrast MediaContrast-enhanced USDispersion imagingFusion imagingMicro-ultrasoundmp-MRImp-USProstate biopsyProstate cancer diagnosisProstate US elastography

Identifiers

PMID32306060
OpenAlexW3016361851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.